PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCBYX vs. PIMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCBYX vs. PIMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX) and PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCBYX achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly higher than PIMIX's -0.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FCBYX has underperformed PIMIX with an annualized return of 3.99%, while PIMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.42% annualized return.


FCBYX

1D
0.35%
1M
-0.46%
6M
0.48%
YTD
0.96%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
6.97%
5Y*
2.69%
10Y*
3.99%
ALL TIME*
4.96%

PIMIX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-1.47%
6M
-0.55%
YTD
-0.05%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
6.95%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
4.42%
ALL TIME*
6.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FCBYX vs. PIMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCBYX
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
0.96%8.55%6.86%9.14%-10.36%1.47%8.45%13.18%-3.07%5.54%
PIMIX
PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class
-0.05%11.08%5.45%9.36%-9.07%2.62%5.84%8.10%0.63%8.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FCBYX and PIMIX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2007

0.70

The correlation between FCBYX and PIMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.87 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCBYX vs. PIMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCBYX
FCBYX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FCBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FCBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

PIMIX
PIMIX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PIMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PIMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCBYX vs. PIMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX) and PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCBYXPIMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.23

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

1.36

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.44

4.32

+2.12

FCBYX vs. PIMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCBYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the PIMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCBYX and PIMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCBYX vs. PIMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCBYX drawdown since its inception was -24.49%, which is greater than PIMIX's maximum drawdown of -13.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBYX and PIMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCBYXPIMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.49%

-13.39%

-11.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.39%

-3.69%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.16%

-3.69%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.74%

-13.34%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.93%

-13.39%

-2.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-1.96%

+1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.39%

-1.68%

-0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

1.16%

-0.43%

Volatility

FCBYX vs. PIMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX) is 0.67%, while PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX) has a volatility of 1.17%. This indicates that FCBYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCBYXPIMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

1.17%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.13%

3.56%

-1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74%

4.15%

-1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.14%

4.89%

-0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.19%

4.26%

-0.07%

FCBYX vs. PIMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCBYX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PIMIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCBYX vs. PIMIX - Dividend Comparison

FCBYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%, less than PIMIX's 5.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCBYX
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
5.26%6.22%6.44%5.59%4.71%3.08%3.58%3.69%3.91%4.92%5.28%5.53%
PIMIX
PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class
5.34%6.01%6.27%6.21%4.98%4.02%4.88%5.83%5.66%5.37%5.52%7.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCBYX and PIMIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIMIX has higher volatility (1.17%) compared to FCBYX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCBYX dropped -24.49% vs PIMIX's -13.39%.

FCBYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCBYX and PIMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer