FCBYX vs. DBSCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX) and Doubleline Selective Credit Fund (DBSCX).
FCBYX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Jan 31, 2000. DBSCX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on Aug 3, 2014.
Performance
FCBYX vs. DBSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCBYX vs. DBSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCBYX Nuveen Strategic Income Fund | -0.09% | 8.55% | 6.86% | 9.14% | -10.36% | 1.47% | 8.45% | 13.18% | -3.07% | 5.54% |
DBSCX Doubleline Selective Credit Fund | 0.30% | 8.46% | 7.78% | 8.55% | -8.10% | 4.13% | 1.83% | 5.68% | 3.03% | 8.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCBYX achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than DBSCX's 0.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCBYX having a 4.48% annualized return and DBSCX not far ahead at 4.58%.
FCBYX
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 5.89%
- 3Y*
- 7.09%
- 5Y*
- 3.03%
- 10Y*
- 4.48%
DBSCX
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 5.91%
- 3Y*
- 7.51%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCBYX vs. DBSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCBYX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than DBSCX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCBYX vs. DBSCX — Risk / Return Rank
FCBYX
DBSCX
FCBYX vs. DBSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX) and Doubleline Selective Credit Fund (DBSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCBYX | DBSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.97 | 2.65 | -0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.10 | 3.83 | -0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.60 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 3.78 | -0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.24 | 14.70 | -4.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCBYX | DBSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 2.65 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 1.39 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.07 | 1.59 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 1.57 | -0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCBYX and DBSCX is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FCBYX vs. DBSCX - Dividend Comparison
FCBYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, more than DBSCX's 5.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCBYX Nuveen Strategic Income Fund | 6.07% | 6.22% | 6.44% | 5.59% | 4.71% | 3.08% | 3.58% | 3.69% | 3.91% | 4.92% | 5.28% | 5.53% |
DBSCX Doubleline Selective Credit Fund | 5.92% | 6.50% | 7.09% | 6.77% | 6.67% | 4.68% | 4.64% | 6.04% | 7.43% | 9.01% | 9.73% | 9.53% |
Drawdowns
FCBYX vs. DBSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCBYX drawdown since its inception was -24.49%, which is greater than DBSCX's maximum drawdown of -14.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBYX and DBSCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCBYX | DBSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.49% | -14.12% | -10.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.39% | -1.60% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.74% | -9.52% | -6.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.93% | -14.12% | -1.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -1.45% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -1.25% | -1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 0.41% | +0.27% |
Volatility
FCBYX vs. DBSCX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX) has a higher volatility of 1.08% compared to Doubleline Selective Credit Fund (DBSCX) at 1.00%. This indicates that FCBYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCBYX | DBSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | 1.00% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.88% | 1.53% | +0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.17% | 2.29% | +0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.10% | 2.70% | +1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.21% | 2.90% | +1.31% |