PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCBTX vs. VICBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCBTX vs. VICBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class M (FCBTX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VICBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCBTX achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly higher than VICBX's 0.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FCBTX has underperformed VICBX with an annualized return of 2.33%, while VICBX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.19% annualized return.


FCBTX

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.34%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.29%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
4.97%
5Y*
-0.10%
10Y*
2.33%

VICBX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.09%
YTD
0.17%
6M
0.32%
1Y
5.58%
3Y*
6.18%
5Y*
1.29%
10Y*
3.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCBTX vs. VICBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCBTX
Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class M
0.22%7.48%2.16%8.07%-17.35%-1.88%10.41%14.02%-2.98%6.37%
VICBX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.17%9.37%3.67%8.87%-14.06%-1.50%9.57%15.96%-1.72%5.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FCBTX and VICBX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2010

0.94

The correlation between FCBTX and VICBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCBTX vs. VICBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCBTX
FCBTX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FCBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FCBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

VICBX
VICBX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
VICBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VICBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VICBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VICBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
VICBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCBTX vs. VICBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class M (FCBTX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VICBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCBTXVICBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.28

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

2.10

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.45

7.01

-1.56

FCBTX vs. VICBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCBTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the VICBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCBTX and VICBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCBTXVICBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

1.58

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.21

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.60

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.88

-0.24

Drawdowns

FCBTX vs. VICBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCBTX drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, which is greater than VICBX's maximum drawdown of -20.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBTX and VICBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCBTXVICBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.60%

-20.55%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-2.95%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.66%

-5.98%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.47%

-20.55%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.60%

-20.55%

-3.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.55%

-1.35%

-2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-3.14%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

0.88%

+0.15%

Volatility

FCBTX vs. VICBX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class M (FCBTX) has a higher volatility of 1.45% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VICBX) at 1.37%. This indicates that FCBTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VICBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCBTXVICBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

1.37%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.17%

2.87%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

3.91%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.71%

6.16%

+0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.95%

5.34%

+0.61%

FCBTX vs. VICBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCBTX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than VICBX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCBTX vs. VICBX - Dividend Comparison

FCBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than VICBX's 4.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCBTX
Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class M
3.89%3.76%3.30%3.10%2.23%2.53%3.04%2.89%3.21%2.74%3.09%2.62%
VICBX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
4.80%4.61%4.79%3.72%3.02%2.82%2.79%5.01%3.64%3.23%3.32%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FCBTX and VICBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCBTX has higher volatility (1.45%) compared to VICBX (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCBTX dropped -23.60% vs VICBX's -20.55%.

VICBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCBTX and VICBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer