FCBR.L vs. JMRE.L
FCBR.L (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation) and JMRE.L (JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - FCBR.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while JMRE.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCBR.L returned 15.80%/yr vs 8.43%/yr for JMRE.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCBR.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for JMRE.L.
Performance
FCBR.L vs. JMRE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCBR.L achieves a 25.54% return, which is significantly lower than JMRE.L's 29.27% return.
FCBR.L
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- 29.92%
- YTD
- 25.54%
- 6M
- 20.34%
- 1Y
- 22.73%
- 3Y*
- 22.18%
- 5Y*
- 15.80%
- 10Y*
- —
JMRE.L
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- 6.70%
- YTD
- 29.27%
- 6M
- 31.42%
- 1Y
- 58.05%
- 3Y*
- 21.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- —
FCBR.L vs. JMRE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation | 25.54% | -0.06% | 20.93% | 33.00% | -18.86% | 21.41% | 27.00% |
JMRE.L JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) | 29.27% | 25.64% | 8.21% | 2.02% | -12.02% | -1.26% | 30.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCBR.L and JMRE.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2020 | 0.41 |
The correlation between FCBR.L and JMRE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FCBR.L vs. JMRE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCBR.L
JMRE.L
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FCBR.L
JMRE.L
Communication Services
FCBR.L
JMRE.L
Industrials
FCBR.L
JMRE.L
Basic Materials
FCBR.L
-
JMRE.L
Consumer Cyclical
FCBR.L
-
JMRE.L
Consumer Defensive
FCBR.L
-
JMRE.L
Energy
FCBR.L
-
JMRE.L
Financial Services
FCBR.L
-
JMRE.L
Healthcare
FCBR.L
-
JMRE.L
Real Estate
FCBR.L
-
JMRE.L
Utilities
FCBR.L
-
JMRE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCBR.L vs. JMRE.L — Risk / Return Rank
FCBR.L
JMRE.L
FCBR.L vs. JMRE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FCBR.L) and JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JMRE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCBR.L | JMRE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.63 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 5.49 | -4.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.13 | 19.12 | -16.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCBR.L | JMRE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 3.43 | -2.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.32 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.24 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
FCBR.L vs. JMRE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCBR.L drawdown since its inception was -26.10%, smaller than the maximum JMRE.L drawdown of -31.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBR.L and JMRE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCBR.L | JMRE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.10% | -31.64% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.30% | -10.51% | -13.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.43% | -23.91% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.10% | -25.50% | -0.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.10% | -2.44% | -0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.01% | -14.76% | +5.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.62% | 3.03% | +7.59% |
Volatility
FCBR.L vs. JMRE.L - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FCBR.L) has a higher volatility of 11.50% compared to JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JMRE.L) at 7.50%. This indicates that FCBR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMRE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCBR.L | JMRE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.50% | 7.50% | +4.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.74% | 14.44% | +7.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.76% | 16.87% | +7.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.88% | 26.64% | -3.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.82% | 26.15% | -3.33% |
FCBR.L vs. JMRE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCBR.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JMRE.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCBR.L vs. JMRE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FCBR.L nor JMRE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FCBR.L and JMRE.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMRE.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMRE.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FCBR.L.
FCBR.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while JMRE.L is Emerging Markets Equities. FCBR.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while JMRE.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FCBR.L and 0.30% for JMRE.L.
Find the right allocation for FCBR.L and JMRE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer