FCBR.L vs. FEXU.L
FCBR.L (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation) and FEXU.L (First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCBR.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while FEXU.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCBR.L returned 15.80%/yr vs 12.02%/yr for FEXU.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCBR.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FEXU.L.
Performance
FCBR.L vs. FEXU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FCBR.L is traded in GBp, while FEXU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FEXU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCBR.L achieves a 25.54% return, which is significantly higher than FEXU.L's 14.74% return.
FCBR.L
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- 29.92%
- YTD
- 25.54%
- 6M
- 20.34%
- 1Y
- 22.73%
- 3Y*
- 22.18%
- 5Y*
- 15.80%
- 10Y*
- —
FEXU.L
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 14.74%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- 1Y
- 30.16%
- 3Y*
- 17.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.02%
- 10Y*
- 13.54%
FCBR.L vs. FEXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation | 25.54% | -0.06% | 20.93% | 33.00% | -18.86% | 21.41% | 27.00% |
FEXU.L First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS ETF | 14.74% | 7.02% | 18.72% | 8.91% | -1.84% | 28.02% | 15.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCBR.L and FEXU.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2020 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FCBR.L and FEXU.L has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FCBR.L vs. FEXU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCBR.L
FEXU.L
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FCBR.L
FEXU.L
Communication Services
FCBR.L
FEXU.L
Industrials
FCBR.L
FEXU.L
Basic Materials
FCBR.L
-
FEXU.L
Consumer Cyclical
FCBR.L
-
FEXU.L
Consumer Defensive
FCBR.L
-
FEXU.L
Energy
FCBR.L
-
FEXU.L
Financial Services
FCBR.L
-
FEXU.L
Healthcare
FCBR.L
-
FEXU.L
Real Estate
FCBR.L
-
FEXU.L
Utilities
FCBR.L
-
FEXU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCBR.L vs. FEXU.L — Risk / Return Rank
FCBR.L
FEXU.L
FCBR.L vs. FEXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FCBR.L) and First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS ETF (FEXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCBR.L | FEXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.43 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 6.72 | -5.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.13 | 20.41 | -18.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCBR.L | FEXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 2.48 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.77 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.78 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
FCBR.L vs. FEXU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCBR.L drawdown since its inception was -26.10%, smaller than the maximum FEXU.L drawdown of -32.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBR.L and FEXU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCBR.L | FEXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.10% | -32.12% | +6.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.30% | -4.47% | -19.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.43% | -21.55% | -3.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.10% | -21.55% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.10% | -0.08% | -3.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.01% | -4.24% | -4.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.62% | 1.47% | +9.15% |
Volatility
FCBR.L vs. FEXU.L - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FCBR.L) has a higher volatility of 11.50% compared to First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS ETF (FEXU.L) at 4.30%. This indicates that FCBR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEXU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCBR.L | FEXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.50% | 4.30% | +7.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.74% | 8.59% | +13.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.76% | 12.09% | +12.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.88% | 15.65% | +7.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.82% | 17.32% | +5.50% |
FCBR.L vs. FEXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCBR.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FEXU.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCBR.L vs. FEXU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FCBR.L nor FEXU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FCBR.L and FEXU.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCBR.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCBR.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FEXU.L.
FCBR.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while FEXU.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. FCBR.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while FEXU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FCBR.L and 0.75% for FEXU.L.
Find the right allocation for FCBR.L and FEXU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer