FCBFX vs. MFBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund (FCBFX) and MFS Corporate Bond Fund (MFBFX).
FCBFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 4, 2010. MFBFX is managed by MFS. It was launched on May 8, 1974.
Performance
FCBFX vs. MFBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCBFX vs. MFBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCBFX Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund | -1.20% | 7.86% | 2.82% | 8.82% | -17.11% | -1.59% | 10.59% | 14.48% | -2.56% | 6.83% |
MFBFX MFS Corporate Bond Fund | -1.25% | 7.35% | 2.03% | 8.09% | -17.27% | -1.47% | 11.01% | 14.43% | -3.19% | 6.08% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FCBFX having a -1.20% return and MFBFX slightly lower at -1.25%. Over the past 10 years, FCBFX has outperformed MFBFX with an annualized return of 2.84%, while MFBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.39% annualized return.
FCBFX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- -1.20%
- 6M
- -0.42%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- 0.46%
- 10Y*
- 2.84%
MFBFX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -2.69%
- YTD
- -1.25%
- 6M
- -0.67%
- 1Y
- 3.70%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- 2.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCBFX vs. MFBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCBFX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than MFBFX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCBFX vs. MFBFX — Risk / Return Rank
FCBFX
MFBFX
FCBFX vs. MFBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund (FCBFX) and MFS Corporate Bond Fund (MFBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCBFX | MFBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 0.94 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 1.32 | +0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.17 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 1.48 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.00 | 4.84 | +0.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCBFX | MFBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 0.94 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | -0.00 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.42 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.47 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCBFX and MFBFX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCBFX vs. MFBFX - Dividend Comparison
FCBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than MFBFX's 4.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCBFX Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund | 3.85% | 4.11% | 3.95% | 3.74% | 2.53% | 2.82% | 3.19% | 3.28% | 3.65% | 3.16% | 3.55% | 3.01% |
MFBFX MFS Corporate Bond Fund | 4.27% | 4.54% | 3.74% | 3.16% | 2.46% | 5.61% | 3.47% | 3.01% | 3.15% | 3.07% | 3.27% | 4.16% |
Drawdowns
FCBFX vs. MFBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCBFX drawdown since its inception was -23.23%, smaller than the maximum MFBFX drawdown of -29.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBFX and MFBFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCBFX | MFBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.23% | -29.78% | +6.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.31% | -3.23% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.21% | -23.44% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.23% | -23.44% | +0.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | -4.75% | +1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -6.20% | +2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 0.99% | +0.04% |
Volatility
FCBFX vs. MFBFX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund (FCBFX) has a higher volatility of 1.85% compared to MFS Corporate Bond Fund (MFBFX) at 1.72%. This indicates that FCBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCBFX | MFBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.85% | 1.72% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.86% | 2.71% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.78% | 4.59% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.68% | 6.38% | +0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 5.72% | +0.22% |