FCBFX vs. FMCSX
FCBFX (Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund) and FMCSX (Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund) are both mutual funds - FCBFX is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by Fidelity, while FMCSX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FCBFX returned 2.33%/yr vs 12.33%/yr for FMCSX. Their -0.09 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FCBFX charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for FMCSX.
Performance
FCBFX vs. FMCSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCBFX achieves a -0.99% return, which is significantly lower than FMCSX's 14.84% return. Over the past 10 years, FCBFX has underperformed FMCSX with an annualized return of 2.33%, while FMCSX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.33% annualized return.
FCBFX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.69%
- 6M
- -1.24%
- YTD
- -0.99%
- 1Y
- 1.61%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- -0.46%
- 10Y*
- 2.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.79%
FMCSX
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -3.33%
- 6M
- 11.06%
- YTD
- 14.84%
- 1Y
- 23.84%
- 3Y*
- 14.66%
- 5Y*
- 10.38%
- 10Y*
- 12.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FCBFX vs. FMCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCBFX Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund | -0.99% | 7.86% | 2.82% | 8.82% | -17.11% | -1.59% | 10.59% | 14.48% | -2.56% | 6.83% |
FMCSX Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund | 14.84% | 11.80% | 14.55% | 11.02% | -6.40% | 28.64% | 11.43% | 25.39% | -6.67% | 18.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCBFX and FMCSX is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2010 | -0.09 |
The correlation between FCBFX and FMCSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCBFX vs. FMCSX — Risk / Return Rank
FCBFX
FMCSX
FCBFX vs. FMCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund (FCBFX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCBFX | FMCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.23 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 2.51 | -1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.23 | 8.76 | -6.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCBFX vs. FMCSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCBFX drawdown since its inception was -23.23%, smaller than the maximum FMCSX drawdown of -62.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBFX and FMCSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCBFX | FMCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.23% | -62.19% | +38.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.31% | -8.55% | +5.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.62% | -22.33% | +16.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.21% | -22.33% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.23% | -40.55% | +17.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.55% | -5.29% | +2.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -9.32% | +5.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | 2.46% | -1.27% |
Volatility
FCBFX vs. FMCSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund (FCBFX) is 1.10%, while Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that FCBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCBFX | FMCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 4.28% | -3.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.31% | 13.15% | -9.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.20% | 16.59% | -12.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.69% | 17.74% | -11.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.96% | 18.56% | -12.60% |
FCBFX vs. FMCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCBFX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than FMCSX's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCBFX vs. FMCSX - Dividend Comparison
FCBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, less than FMCSX's 5.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCBFX Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund | 3.98% | 4.11% | 3.95% | 3.74% | 2.53% | 2.82% | 3.19% | 3.28% | 3.65% | 3.16% | 3.55% | 3.01% |
FMCSX Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund | 5.40% | 1.83% | 8.94% | 2.60% | 5.44% | 12.80% | 6.72% | 6.63% | 18.48% | 6.66% | 8.25% | 14.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCBFX and FMCSX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMCSX has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to FCBFX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCBFX dropped -23.23% vs FMCSX's -62.19%.
FMCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCBFX and FMCSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer