FCBD vs. USDX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FCBD (Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF) and USDX (SGI Enhanced Core ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FCBD returned 3.89% vs 5.97% for USDX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCBD charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for USDX.

Performance

FCBD vs. USDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD) and SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCBD achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than USDX's 1.79% return.

FCBD

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -0.05%
• YTD: 0.28%
• 6M: 0.53%
• 1Y: 3.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

USDX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 1.79%
• 6M: 2.25%
• 1Y: 5.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCBD vs. USDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FCBD Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF	0.28%	6.29%	0.04%
USDX SGI Enhanced Core ETF	1.79%	6.25%	0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FCBD and USDX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024	0.01

Return for Risk

FCBD vs. USDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCBD

FCBD Risk / Return Rank: 49
FCBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
FCBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FCBD Omega Ratio Rank: 48
FCBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
FCBD Martin Ratio Rank: 45

USDX

USDX Risk / Return Rank: 94
USDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
USDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
USDX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
USDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
USDX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCBD vs. USDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD) and SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCBD	USDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	3.11	-1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	4.82	-2.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.77	-0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	6.40	-4.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.25	43.95	-36.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCBD vs. USDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCBD Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the USDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCBD and USDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCBD	USDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.67	3.11	-1.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.76	3.96	-2.19

Drawdowns

FCBD vs. USDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCBD drawdown since its inception was -1.64%, which is greater than USDX's maximum drawdown of -0.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBD and USDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCBD	USDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.64%	-0.94%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.64%	-0.94%	-0.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.92%	-0.64%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.35%	-0.06%	-0.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.54%	0.14%	+0.40%

Volatility

FCBD vs. USDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD) is 0.84%, while SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX) has a volatility of 0.98%. This indicates that FCBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCBD	USDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.84%	0.98%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.72%	1.73%	-0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35%	1.93%	+0.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.60%	1.68%	+0.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.60%	1.68%	+0.92%

FCBD vs. USDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCBD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than USDX's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCBD vs. USDX - Dividend Comparison

FCBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than USDX's 5.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FCBD Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF	4.23%	4.34%	0.08%
USDX SGI Enhanced Core ETF	5.90%	5.88%	4.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCBD and USDX in my portfolio?

FCBD and USDX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCBD or USDX?

USDX has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to FCBD (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCBD dropped -1.64% vs USDX's -0.94%.

Which ETF is better, FCBD or USDX?

On 1-year performance, USDX leads with 5.97% vs 3.89% for FCBD. On fees, FCBD is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, FCBD has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FCBD or USDX?

Over the 1-year period, USDX has performed better with a 5.97% return vs 3.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCBD or USDX?

FCBD is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for USDX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FCBD or USDX?

USDX has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 4.23% for FCBD.

What is the main difference between FCBD and USDX?

They also come from different issuers: Frontier and Summit Global Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for FCBD and 0.98% for USDX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.