PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCBD vs. PCRB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCBD vs. PCRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD) and Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FCBD

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.19%
6M
0.17%
YTD
0.25%
1Y
3.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PCRB

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCBD vs. PCRB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FCBD
Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF
0.25%6.29%-0.02%
PCRB
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -
-0.48%7.21%0.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FCBD and PCRB is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024

0.87

The correlation between FCBD and PCRB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCBD vs. PCRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCBD
FCBD Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FCBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCBD Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FCBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCBD Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

PCRB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCBD vs. PCRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD) and Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCBDPCRBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.84

FCBD vs. PCRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCBD vs. PCRB - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCBDPCRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

Volatility

FCBD vs. PCRB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCBDPCRBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.58%

FCBD vs. PCRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCBD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PCRB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCBD vs. PCRB - Dividend Comparison

FCBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, while PCRB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
FCBD
Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF
4.17%4.34%0.08%0.00%
PCRB
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -
9.42%4.30%4.38%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCBD and PCRB have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PCRB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PCRB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FCBD.

PCRB has the higher dividend yield at 9.42%, compared with 4.17% for FCBD.

They also come from different issuers: Frontier and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for FCBD and 0.35% for PCRB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCBD and PCRB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer