FCBD vs. BIV
FCBD (Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF) and BIV (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. FCBD is actively managed, while BIV is passively managed. Over the past year, FCBD returned 4.98% vs 6.45% for BIV. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCBD charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BIV.
Performance
FCBD vs. BIV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCBD achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than BIV's 0.74% return.
FCBD
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 0.87%
- 1Y
- 4.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIV
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 6.45%
- 3Y*
- 4.43%
- 5Y*
- 0.61%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
FCBD vs. BIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FCBD Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF | 0.44% | 6.29% | 0.04% |
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF | 0.74% | 8.52% | 0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCBD and BIV is 0.95 — these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between FCBD and BIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCBD vs. BIV — Risk / Return Rank
FCBD
BIV
FCBD vs. BIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCBD | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.13 | 1.55 | +0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.24 | 2.31 | +0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.27 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 2.34 | +0.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.13 | 7.95 | +4.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCBD | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 1.55 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.02 | 0.66 | +1.36 |
Drawdowns
FCBD vs. BIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCBD drawdown since its inception was -1.63%, smaller than the maximum BIV drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBD and BIV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCBD | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.63% | -18.95% | +17.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.63% | -2.87% | +1.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -1.07% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.29% | -3.40% | +3.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.44% | 0.85% | -0.41% |
Volatility
FCBD vs. BIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD) is 0.98%, while Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) has a volatility of 1.64%. This indicates that FCBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCBD | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | 1.64% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.57% | 2.76% | -1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36% | 4.20% | -1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.58% | 6.38% | -3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.58% | 5.50% | -2.92% |
FCBD vs. BIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCBD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than BIV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCBD vs. BIV - Dividend Comparison
FCBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than BIV's 4.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCBD Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF | 4.22% | 4.34% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF | 4.10% | 4.01% | 3.79% | 3.09% | 2.41% | 3.42% | 2.95% | 2.75% | 2.88% | 2.69% | 3.01% | 3.02% |