PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCBAX vs. LKFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCBAX vs. LKFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class A (FCBAX) and LKCM Fixed Income Fund (LKFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCBAX achieves a -1.14% return, which is significantly lower than LKFIX's -0.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCBAX having a 1.97% annualized return and LKFIX not far behind at 1.93%.


FCBAX

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.69%
6M
-1.38%
YTD
-1.14%
1Y
1.32%
3Y*
4.18%
5Y*
-0.88%
10Y*
1.97%
ALL TIME*
3.41%

LKFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.48%
6M
-0.17%
YTD
-0.07%
1Y
2.09%
3Y*
4.33%
5Y*
1.49%
10Y*
1.93%
ALL TIME*
3.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FCBAX vs. LKFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCBAX
Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class A
-1.14%7.51%2.21%8.10%-17.32%-1.85%10.46%14.11%-2.90%6.47%
LKFIX
LKCM Fixed Income Fund
-0.07%6.66%3.06%4.98%-5.63%-1.54%4.29%6.71%0.26%2.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FCBAX and LKFIX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2010

0.79

The correlation between FCBAX and LKFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCBAX vs. LKFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCBAX
FCBAX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FCBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FCBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

LKFIX
LKFIX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
LKFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
LKFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCBAX vs. LKFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class A (FCBAX) and LKCM Fixed Income Fund (LKFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCBAXLKFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.20

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

1.52

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.90

4.11

-2.22

FCBAX vs. LKFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCBAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the LKFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCBAX and LKFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCBAX vs. LKFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCBAX drawdown since its inception was -23.56%, which is greater than LKFIX's maximum drawdown of -8.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBAX and LKFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCBAXLKFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.56%

-8.97%

-14.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-1.76%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.64%

-2.19%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.44%

-8.52%

-14.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.56%

-8.97%

-14.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.70%

-1.09%

-3.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-1.11%

-3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

0.65%

+0.57%

Volatility

FCBAX vs. LKFIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class A (FCBAX) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to LKCM Fixed Income Fund (LKFIX) at 0.56%. This indicates that FCBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LKFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCBAXLKFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

0.56%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.30%

1.98%

+1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.19%

2.51%

+1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.68%

3.00%

+3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.95%

2.64%

+3.31%

FCBAX vs. LKFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCBAX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than LKFIX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCBAX vs. LKFIX - Dividend Comparison

FCBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than LKFIX's 3.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCBAX
Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class A
3.68%3.79%3.35%3.13%2.27%2.55%3.09%2.96%3.29%2.83%3.19%2.69%
LKFIX
LKCM Fixed Income Fund
3.84%3.57%3.03%2.28%1.57%1.36%1.74%2.27%2.26%2.04%2.18%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCBAX and LKFIX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCBAX has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to LKFIX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCBAX dropped -23.56% vs LKFIX's -8.97%.

LKFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCBAX and LKFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer