PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCAUX vs. YFSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCAUX vs. YFSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Climate Action Fund (FCAUX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCAUX achieves a 15.66% return, which is significantly lower than YFSNX's 19.58% return.


FCAUX

1D
-0.69%
1M
-2.27%
6M
15.66%
YTD
15.66%
1Y
34.77%
3Y*
22.40%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*

YFSNX

1D
-1.63%
1M
-6.45%
6M
19.58%
YTD
19.58%
1Y
16.34%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCAUX vs. YFSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FCAUX
Fidelity Climate Action Fund
15.66%21.27%24.06%19.06%-25.29%11.40%
YFSNX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N
19.58%14.79%-0.47%16.48%-9.39%-1.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FCAUX and YFSNX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021

0.66

The correlation between FCAUX and YFSNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCAUX vs. YFSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCAUX
FCAUX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FCAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FCAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

YFSNX
YFSNX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
YFSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
YFSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCAUX vs. YFSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Climate Action Fund (FCAUX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCAUXYFSNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.20

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

1.23

+2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.37

3.72

+10.64

FCAUX vs. YFSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCAUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the YFSNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCAUX and YFSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCAUX vs. YFSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCAUX drawdown since its inception was -35.11%, roughly equal to the maximum YFSNX drawdown of -35.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAUX and YFSNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCAUXYFSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.11%

-35.14%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-14.09%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.34%

-14.29%

-9.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.11%

-25.26%

-9.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

-6.67%

+4.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.76%

-4.94%

-5.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

4.63%

-2.14%

Volatility

FCAUX vs. YFSNX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Climate Action Fund (FCAUX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) have volatilities of 6.67% and 6.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCAUXYFSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.67%

6.90%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.05%

15.40%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.36%

22.15%

-5.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.34%

15.64%

+3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

16.32%

+2.95%

FCAUX vs. YFSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCAUX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than YFSNX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCAUX vs. YFSNX - Dividend Comparison

Neither FCAUX nor YFSNX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCAUX
Fidelity Climate Action Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.15%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YFSNX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N
0.00%0.00%8.40%7.86%4.33%8.06%4.71%6.59%0.71%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCAUX and YFSNX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YFSNX has higher volatility (6.90%) compared to FCAUX (6.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCAUX dropped -35.11% vs YFSNX's -35.14%.

FCAUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCAUX and YFSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer