PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCAUX vs. GQRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCAUX vs. GQRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Climate Action Fund (FCAUX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCAUX achieves a 15.66% return, which is significantly higher than GQRIX's 5.11% return.


FCAUX

1D
-0.69%
1M
-2.27%
6M
15.66%
YTD
15.66%
1Y
34.77%
3Y*
22.40%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*

GQRIX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-2.45%
6M
5.11%
YTD
5.11%
1Y
4.83%
3Y*
12.37%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCAUX vs. GQRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FCAUX
Fidelity Climate Action Fund
15.66%21.27%24.06%19.06%-25.29%11.40%
GQRIX
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares
5.11%0.91%20.18%19.79%-3.64%4.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FCAUX and GQRIX is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021

0.63

The correlation between FCAUX and GQRIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCAUX vs. GQRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCAUX
FCAUX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FCAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FCAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

GQRIX
GQRIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
GQRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
GQRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCAUX vs. GQRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Climate Action Fund (FCAUX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCAUXGQRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.08

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

0.57

+2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.37

1.37

+13.00

FCAUX vs. GQRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCAUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the GQRIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCAUX and GQRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCAUX vs. GQRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCAUX drawdown since its inception was -35.11%, which is greater than GQRIX's maximum drawdown of -28.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAUX and GQRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCAUXGQRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.11%

-28.86%

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-7.00%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.34%

-16.47%

-6.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.11%

-20.29%

-14.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

-5.82%

+3.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.76%

-4.90%

-5.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

2.91%

-0.42%

Volatility

FCAUX vs. GQRIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Climate Action Fund (FCAUX) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQRIX) at 3.70%. This indicates that FCAUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCAUXGQRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.67%

3.70%

+2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.05%

7.45%

+5.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.36%

9.36%

+7.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.34%

14.73%

+4.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

17.21%

+2.06%

FCAUX vs. GQRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCAUX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than GQRIX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCAUX vs. GQRIX - Dividend Comparison

FCAUX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GQRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FCAUX
Fidelity Climate Action Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.15%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GQRIX
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares
7.56%7.94%6.46%1.39%2.99%1.65%0.11%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCAUX and GQRIX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCAUX has higher volatility (6.67%) compared to GQRIX (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCAUX dropped -35.11% vs GQRIX's -28.86%.

FCAUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCAUX and GQRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer