PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCAUX vs. GQFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCAUX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Climate Action Fund (FCAUX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCAUX achieves a 17.41% return, which is significantly higher than GQFPX's 7.65% return.


FCAUX

1D
-0.80%
1M
5.18%
YTD
17.41%
6M
17.09%
1Y
41.57%
3Y*
24.17%
5Y*
10Y*

GQFPX

1D
-1.06%
1M
-3.67%
YTD
7.65%
6M
7.70%
1Y
15.46%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCAUX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FCAUX
Fidelity Climate Action Fund
17.41%21.27%24.06%19.06%-25.29%9.65%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
7.65%19.29%4.81%15.09%-1.13%5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FCAUX and GQFPX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between FCAUX and GQFPX has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCAUX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCAUX
FCAUX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FCAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FCAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

GQFPX
GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCAUX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Climate Action Fund (FCAUX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCAUXGQFPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.27

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.04

2.79

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.23

7.90

+10.34

FCAUX vs. GQFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCAUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the GQFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCAUX and GQFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCAUXGQFPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

1.54

+1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.80

-0.18

Drawdowns

FCAUX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCAUX drawdown since its inception was -35.11%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAUX and GQFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCAUXGQFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.11%

-16.95%

-18.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-5.24%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.34%

-10.57%

-12.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-4.95%

+4.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.88%

-3.01%

-7.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

1.85%

+0.46%

Volatility

FCAUX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Climate Action Fund (FCAUX) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) at 3.32%. This indicates that FCAUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCAUXGQFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

3.32%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.75%

7.71%

+4.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.36%

9.52%

+5.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.21%

12.83%

+6.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.21%

12.83%

+6.38%

FCAUX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCAUX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCAUX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison

FCAUX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GQFPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FCAUX
Fidelity Climate Action Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.15%0.04%0.00%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
5.93%5.32%3.71%3.69%5.18%1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCAUX and GQFPX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCAUX has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to GQFPX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCAUX dropped -35.11% vs GQFPX's -16.95%.

FCAUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCAUX and GQFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer