FCAMX vs. NPV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FCAMX (Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund) and NPV (Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, FCAMX returned 2.53%/yr vs 2.10%/yr for NPV. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCAMX charges 0.72%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for NPV.

Performance

FCAMX vs. NPV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund (FCAMX) and Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCAMX achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly lower than NPV's 6.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FCAMX has outperformed NPV with an annualized return of 2.53%, while NPV has yielded a comparatively lower 2.10% annualized return.

FCAMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.95%
• YTD: 2.33%
• 6M: 2.94%
• 1Y: 7.89%
• 3Y*: 5.07%
• 5Y*: 1.01%
• 10Y*: 2.53%

NPV

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 1.79%
• YTD: 6.33%
• 6M: 5.29%
• 1Y: 9.01%
• 3Y*: 8.40%
• 5Y*: -1.79%
• 10Y*: 2.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCAMX vs. NPV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCAMX Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund	2.33%	4.64%	4.89%	5.32%	-11.97%	3.88%	4.64%	10.19%	0.97%	6.79%
NPV Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund	6.33%	-5.91%	24.61%	0.42%	-31.53%	10.93%	13.15%	29.60%	-4.42%	3.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FCAMX and NPV is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 1994	0.18

The correlation between FCAMX and NPV shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.43 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCAMX vs. NPV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCAMX

FCAMX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FCAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FCAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FCAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FCAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FCAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

NPV

NPV Risk / Return Rank: 27
NPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
NPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
NPV Omega Ratio Rank: 25
NPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
NPV Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCAMX vs. NPV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund (FCAMX) and Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCAMX	NPV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	1.31	+1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.86	1.96	+1.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.24	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	2.10	+0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.69	5.28	+4.41

FCAMX vs. NPV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCAMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the NPV Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCAMX and NPV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCAMX vs. NPV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCAMX drawdown since its inception was -24.20%, smaller than the maximum NPV drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAMX and NPV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCAMX	NPV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.20%	-44.25%	+20.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.95%	-4.31%	+1.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.05%	-18.29%	+11.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.74%	-44.25%	+26.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.74%	-44.25%	+26.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-16.15%	+16.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.65%	-10.19%	+7.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	1.71%	-0.89%

Volatility

FCAMX vs. NPV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund (FCAMX) is 0.85%, while Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV) has a volatility of 1.54%. This indicates that FCAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NPV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCAMX	NPV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.85%	1.54%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.44%	4.97%	-2.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.29%	6.90%	-3.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.75%	13.46%	-8.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.84%	13.19%	-8.35%

FCAMX vs. NPV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCAMX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than NPV's 1.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCAMX vs. NPV - Dividend Comparison

FCAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than NPV's 6.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCAMX Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund	4.30%	5.70%	4.78%	4.05%	3.55%	3.01%	3.21%	3.95%	3.77%	3.37%	3.76%	3.96%
NPV Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund	6.95%	7.55%	5.63%	3.89%	5.08%	3.42%	3.49%	3.58%	4.62%	4.40%	4.87%	5.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCAMX and NPV in my portfolio?

FCAMX and NPV have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCAMX or NPV?

NPV has higher volatility (1.54%) compared to FCAMX (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCAMX dropped -24.20% vs NPV's -44.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.