FCAMX vs. FKGRX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FCAMX (Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund) and FKGRX (Franklin Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FCAMX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while FKGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, FCAMX returned 2.64%/yr vs 14.05%/yr for FKGRX. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. FCAMX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FKGRX.

Performance

FCAMX vs. FKGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund (FCAMX) and Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCAMX achieves a 2.22% return, which is significantly lower than FKGRX's 6.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FCAMX has underperformed FKGRX with an annualized return of 2.64%, while FKGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.

FCAMX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.80%
• YTD: 2.22%
• 6M: 2.83%
• 1Y: 7.90%
• 3Y*: 5.11%
• 5Y*: 1.04%
• 10Y*: 2.64%

FKGRX

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 1.81%
• YTD: 6.95%
• 6M: 6.44%
• 1Y: 19.57%
• 3Y*: 17.73%
• 5Y*: 9.56%
• 10Y*: 14.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCAMX vs. FKGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCAMX Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund	2.22%	4.64%	4.89%	5.32%	-11.97%	3.88%	4.64%	10.19%	0.97%	6.79%
FKGRX Franklin Growth Fund	6.95%	15.38%	17.96%	27.54%	-25.32%	21.61%	30.71%	32.08%	-3.37%	26.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FCAMX and FKGRX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 1993	-0.04

The correlation between FCAMX and FKGRX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCAMX vs. FKGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCAMX

FCAMX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FCAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FCAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FCAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FCAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FCAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

FKGRX

FKGRX Risk / Return Rank: 29
FKGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FKGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FKGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
FKGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
FKGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCAMX vs. FKGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund (FCAMX) and Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCAMX	FKGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	1.51	+0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.90	2.13	+1.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.27	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	1.71	+1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.83	6.97	+2.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCAMX vs. FKGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCAMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the FKGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCAMX and FKGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCAMX	FKGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43	1.51	+0.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	0.49	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.72	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.15	0.71	+0.45

Drawdowns

FCAMX vs. FKGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCAMX drawdown since its inception was -24.20%, smaller than the maximum FKGRX drawdown of -51.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAMX and FKGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCAMX	FKGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.20%	-51.08%	+26.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.95%	-11.48%	+8.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.05%	-21.72%	+14.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.74%	-32.22%	+14.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.74%	-32.52%	+14.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.42%	+0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.65%	-6.74%	+4.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	2.81%	-1.99%

Volatility

FCAMX vs. FKGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund (FCAMX) is 1.23%, while Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX) has a volatility of 3.23%. This indicates that FCAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCAMX	FKGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.23%	3.23%	-2.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.44%	10.12%	-7.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.31%	13.00%	-9.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.75%	19.59%	-14.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.84%	19.53%	-14.69%

FCAMX vs. FKGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCAMX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than FKGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCAMX vs. FKGRX - Dividend Comparison

FCAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than FKGRX's 13.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCAMX Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund	4.30%	5.70%	4.78%	4.05%	3.55%	3.01%	3.21%	3.95%	3.77%	3.37%	3.76%	3.96%
FKGRX Franklin Growth Fund	13.44%	14.37%	8.34%	6.26%	10.49%	9.19%	7.97%	5.75%	1.65%	2.38%	3.26%	3.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCAMX and FKGRX in my portfolio?

FCAMX and FKGRX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCAMX or FKGRX?

FKGRX has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to FCAMX (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCAMX dropped -24.20% vs FKGRX's -51.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.