FCAGX vs. KSOAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) and Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A (KSOAX).
FCAGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 2004. KSOAX is managed by Kinetics. It was launched on Dec 31, 2001.
Performance
FCAGX vs. KSOAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCAGX vs. KSOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCAGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A | -0.87% | 10.88% | 20.21% | 18.72% | -25.57% | 10.19% | 36.01% | 35.97% | -4.85% | 28.62% |
KSOAX Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A | 31.23% | -8.89% | 68.00% | -14.98% | 31.64% | 49.94% | 2.04% | 26.72% | 0.00% | 25.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCAGX achieves a -0.87% return, which is significantly lower than KSOAX's 31.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FCAGX has underperformed KSOAX with an annualized return of 13.00%, while KSOAX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.00% annualized return.
FCAGX
- 1D
- 4.98%
- 1M
- -6.49%
- YTD
- -0.87%
- 6M
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 23.76%
- 3Y*
- 13.57%
- 5Y*
- 3.87%
- 10Y*
- 13.00%
KSOAX
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -8.52%
- YTD
- 31.23%
- 6M
- 22.23%
- 1Y
- 7.68%
- 3Y*
- 25.99%
- 5Y*
- 15.80%
- 10Y*
- 21.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCAGX vs. KSOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCAGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than KSOAX's 1.89% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCAGX vs. KSOAX — Risk / Return Rank
FCAGX
KSOAX
FCAGX vs. KSOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) and Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A (KSOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCAGX | KSOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 0.32 | +0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.45 | 0.64 | +0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.08 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 0.41 | +1.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.23 | 0.67 | +5.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCAGX | KSOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 0.32 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.57 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.82 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.56 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCAGX and KSOAX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FCAGX vs. KSOAX - Dividend Comparison
FCAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%, while KSOAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCAGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A | 7.01% | 6.94% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.36% | 8.58% | 5.58% | 14.80% | 7.05% | 0.79% | 4.32% |
KSOAX Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.52% | 6.72% | 0.00% | 1.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FCAGX vs. KSOAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCAGX drawdown since its inception was -61.19%, smaller than the maximum KSOAX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAGX and KSOAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCAGX | KSOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.19% | -70.21% | +9.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.76% | -24.40% | +10.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.13% | -33.28% | -5.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.13% | -47.11% | +7.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | -10.22% | +1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.56% | -15.88% | +4.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.70% | 14.91% | -11.21% |
Volatility
FCAGX vs. KSOAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) has a higher volatility of 9.90% compared to Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A (KSOAX) at 7.98%. This indicates that FCAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KSOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCAGX | KSOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.90% | 7.98% | +1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.76% | 19.42% | -2.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.94% | 28.84% | -3.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.42% | 27.74% | -4.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.74% | 25.84% | -3.10% |