FBYY vs. PTIR
FBYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF) and PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while PTIR is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Palantir Technologies Inc. (200%). FBYY is actively managed, while PTIR is passively managed. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FBYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for PTIR.
Performance
FBYY vs. PTIR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBYY achieves a -30.28% return, which is significantly higher than PTIR's -62.18% return.
FBYY
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -6.21%
- 6M
- -28.55%
- YTD
- -30.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PTIR
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -11.63%
- 6M
- -43.20%
- YTD
- -62.18%
- 1Y
- -56.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 164.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.18K | $10.40K | $13.97K | |
| $34.43M | $50.90M | $65.92M |
FBYY vs. PTIR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FBYY GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF | -30.28% | -11.29% |
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | -62.18% | -10.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBYY and PTIR is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBYY vs. PTIR — Risk / Return Rank
FBYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PTIR
FBYY vs. PTIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF (FBYY) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBYY | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.95 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.74 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.21 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBYY vs. PTIR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBYY drawdown since its inception was -41.00%, smaller than the maximum PTIR drawdown of -79.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBYY and PTIR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBYY | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.00% | -79.40% | +38.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -79.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.99% | -73.93% | +32.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.60% | -31.05% | +5.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 48.56% | — |
Volatility
FBYY vs. PTIR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBYY | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 27.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 81.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.23% | 104.45% | -81.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 127.66% | -104.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 127.66% | -104.43% |
FBYY vs. PTIR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PTIR's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBYY vs. PTIR - Dividend Comparison
FBYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 54.90%, more than PTIR's 15.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FBYY GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF | 54.90% | 10.35% |
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | 15.36% | 5.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBYY and PTIR have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PTIR is cheaper at 1.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PTIR is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for FBYY.
FBYY has the higher dividend yield at 54.90%, compared with 15.36% for PTIR.
FBYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while PTIR is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for FBYY and 1.04% for PTIR.
Find the right allocation for FBYY and PTIR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer