FBUF vs. FETH
FBUF (Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF) and FETH (Fidelity Ethereum Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FBUF is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FETH is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index. FBUF is actively managed, while FETH is passively managed. Over the past year, FBUF returned 19.61% vs -31.75% for FETH. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBUF charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FETH.
Performance
FBUF vs. FETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBUF achieves a 5.32% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -39.45% return.
FBUF
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.85%
- YTD
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- 19.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FETH
- 1D
- -5.78%
- 1M
- -23.67%
- YTD
- -39.45%
- 6M
- -42.77%
- 1Y
- -31.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBUF vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF | 5.32% | 14.01% | 6.15% |
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | -39.45% | -11.37% | -3.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBUF and FETH is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBUF vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank
FBUF
FETH
FBUF vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBUF | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 0.97 | +0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.51 | -0.51 | +4.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.68 | -0.84 | +16.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBUF | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | -0.47 | +3.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.47 | -0.41 | +1.88 |
Drawdowns
FBUF vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBUF drawdown since its inception was -11.09%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -64.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBUF and FETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBUF | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.09% | -64.00% | +52.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.61% | -62.95% | +57.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -62.95% | +62.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.38% | -32.73% | +31.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 37.82% | -36.57% |
Volatility
FBUF vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) is 1.11%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 9.99%. This indicates that FBUF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBUF | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 9.99% | -8.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.37% | 46.01% | -40.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.49% | 68.50% | -61.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.55% | 72.27% | -62.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.55% | 72.27% | -62.72% |
FBUF vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBUF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBUF vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison
FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF | 0.63% | 0.64% | 0.54% |
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBUF and FETH have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FETH has higher volatility (9.99%) compared to FBUF (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBUF dropped -11.09% vs FETH's -64.00%.
On 1-year performance, FBUF leads with 19.61% vs -31.75% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, FBUF has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FBUF has performed better with a 19.61% return vs -31.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FETH is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for FBUF.
FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.
FBUF is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for FBUF and 0.00% for FETH.
FBUF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBUF and FETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer