FBTU.L vs. QCLN
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating (FBTU.L) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN).
FBTU.L and QCLN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FBTU.L is managed by First Trust. QCLN is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy. It was launched on Feb 8, 2007.
Performance
FBTU.L vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FBTU.L vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBTU.L First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating | -5.44% | 25.95% | 4.74% | 3.91% | -5.96% | -3.77% | 3.88% |
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 5.17% | 31.81% | -18.86% | -10.02% | -30.37% | -3.21% | 162.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBTU.L achieves a -5.44% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 5.17% return.
FBTU.L
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- -4.92%
- YTD
- -5.44%
- 6M
- 12.00%
- 1Y
- 18.72%
- 3Y*
- 8.81%
- 5Y*
- 3.92%
- 10Y*
- —
QCLN
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -4.61%
- YTD
- 5.17%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- 1Y
- 61.08%
- 3Y*
- -2.97%
- 5Y*
- -7.09%
- 10Y*
- 12.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FBTU.L vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FBTU.L and QCLN have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Return for Risk
FBTU.L vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank
FBTU.L
QCLN
FBTU.L vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating (FBTU.L) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBTU.L | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 1.63 | -0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 2.23 | -0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.27 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 3.97 | -2.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.61 | 12.27 | -8.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBTU.L | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 1.63 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | -0.19 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.15 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between FBTU.L and QCLN is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FBTU.L vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison
FBTU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBTU.L First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 0.21% | 0.25% | 0.87% | 0.76% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.30% | 0.85% | 1.03% | 0.45% | 1.24% | 0.72% |
Drawdowns
FBTU.L vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBTU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.73%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTU.L and QCLN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBTU.L | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.73% | -76.18% | +42.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.22% | -16.18% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.97% | -69.49% | +39.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.52% | -45.67% | +34.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.30% | -43.54% | +30.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.00% | 5.24% | -0.24% |
Volatility
FBTU.L vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating (FBTU.L) is 7.43%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 13.73%. This indicates that FBTU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FBTU.L | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.43% | 13.73% | -6.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.90% | 27.33% | -12.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.95% | 37.76% | -14.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 37.87% | -17.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 34.62% | -13.37% |