FBTC vs. SETH

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) and SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - FBTC tracks the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate while SETH tracks the Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FBTC returned -47.53% vs 14.25% for SETH. At a correlation of -0.82, they often move in opposite directions. FBTC charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SETH.

Performance

FBTC vs. SETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBTC achieves a -28.99% return, which is significantly lower than SETH's 37.43% return.

FBTC

• 1D: -2.67%
• 1M: -2.20%
• 6M: -32.07%
• YTD: -28.99%
• 1Y: -47.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SETH

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: -8.19%
• 6M: 43.90%
• YTD: 37.43%
• 1Y: 14.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBTC vs. SETH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	-28.99%	-6.56%	94.28%
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	37.43%	-29.41%	-44.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FBTC and SETH is -0.88, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	-0.82

The correlation between FBTC and SETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.88 to -0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FBTC vs. SETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTC

FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 1
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 1
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 1

SETH

SETH Risk / Return Rank: 15
SETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
SETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
SETH Omega Ratio Rank: 17
SETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
SETH Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBTC vs. SETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBTC	SETH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.08	0.21	-1.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.66	0.76	-2.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.09	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	0.34	-1.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.46	0.62	-2.07

FBTC vs. SETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBTC Sharpe Ratio is -1.08, which is lower than the SETH Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBTC and SETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBTC vs. SETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTC drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, smaller than the maximum SETH drawdown of -80.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC and SETH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBTC	SETH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.35%	-80.74%	+27.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.35%	-41.92%	-11.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.54%	-62.25%	+11.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.49%	-54.90%	+37.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.68%	23.13%	+9.55%

Volatility

FBTC vs. SETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) is 11.38%, while ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) has a volatility of 16.64%. This indicates that FBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBTC	SETH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.38%	16.64%	-5.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.71%	46.74%	-12.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.27%	68.32%	-24.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.84%	69.32%	-19.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.84%	69.32%	-19.48%

FBTC vs. SETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SETH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBTC vs. SETH - Dividend Comparison

FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.24%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	16.24%	7.01%	3.44%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBTC and SETH in my portfolio?

FBTC and SETH have a correlation of -0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBTC or SETH?

SETH has higher volatility (16.64%) compared to FBTC (11.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBTC dropped -53.35% vs SETH's -80.74%.

Which ETF is better, FBTC or SETH?

On 1-year performance, SETH leads with 14.25% vs -47.53% for FBTC. On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FBTC has been the lower-risk option at 11.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FBTC or SETH?

Over the 1-year period, SETH has performed better with a 14.25% return vs -47.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBTC or SETH?

FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SETH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBTC or SETH?

SETH has the higher dividend yield at 16.24%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.

What is the main difference between FBTC and SETH?

FBTC tracks Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate, while SETH tracks Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%). They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FBTC and 0.95% for SETH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.