PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBTC vs. MSBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBTC vs. MSBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FBTC

1D
-2.65%
1M
-18.37%
YTD
-25.34%
6M
-29.78%
1Y
-38.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSBT

1D
-2.70%
1M
-18.41%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBTC vs. MSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FBTC and MSBT is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026

1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBTC vs. MSBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTC
FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

MSBT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBTC vs. MSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBTCMSBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

FBTC vs. MSBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBTCMSBTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

-1.33

+1.63

Drawdowns

FBTC vs. MSBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTC drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, which is greater than MSBT's maximum drawdown of -20.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC and MSBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBTCMSBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.33%

-20.25%

-29.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.00%

-20.25%

-27.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.01%

-3.91%

-12.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.41%

Volatility

FBTC vs. MSBT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBTCMSBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.61%

32.92%

+10.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.13%

32.92%

+17.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.13%

32.92%

+17.21%

FBTC vs. MSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MSBT's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FBTC vs. MSBT - Dividend Comparison

Neither FBTC nor MSBT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FBTC and MSBT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FBTC.

FBTC and MSBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

FBTC tracks Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate, while MSBT tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FBTC and 0.14% for MSBT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBTC and MSBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer