FBTC vs. GDE
FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) and GDE (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate, while GDE is a Gold fund actively managed by WisdomTree. FBTC is passively managed, while GDE is actively managed. Over the past year, FBTC returned -39.41% vs 47.93% for GDE. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBTC charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for GDE.
Performance
FBTC vs. GDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBTC achieves a -27.63% return, which is significantly lower than GDE's 5.74% return.
FBTC
- 1D
- 5.17%
- 1M
- -20.97%
- YTD
- -27.63%
- 6M
- -30.29%
- 1Y
- -39.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDE
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -7.44%
- YTD
- 5.74%
- 6M
- 8.50%
- 1Y
- 47.93%
- 3Y*
- 44.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBTC vs. GDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | -27.63% | -6.56% | 99.56% |
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | 5.74% | 73.76% | 48.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBTC and GDE is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBTC vs. GDE — Risk / Return Rank
FBTC
GDE
FBTC vs. GDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBTC | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.31 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | 2.13 | -2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 6.49 | -7.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBTC | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 | 1.66 | -2.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 1.10 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
FBTC vs. GDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBTC drawdown since its inception was -52.07%, which is greater than GDE's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC and GDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBTC | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.07% | -32.01% | -20.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.07% | -22.66% | -29.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.59% | -14.44% | -35.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.18% | -7.90% | -8.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.93% | 7.40% | +21.53% |
Volatility
FBTC vs. GDE - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a higher volatility of 11.77% compared to WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) at 8.25%. This indicates that FBTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBTC | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.77% | 8.25% | +3.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.55% | 25.04% | +9.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.17% | 29.09% | +15.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.26% | 26.26% | +24.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.26% | 26.26% | +24.00% |
FBTC vs. GDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBTC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GDE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FBTC vs. GDE - Dividend Comparison
FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | 4.09% | 4.32% | 7.14% | 2.22% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBTC and GDE have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBTC has higher volatility (11.77%) compared to GDE (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBTC dropped -52.07% vs GDE's -32.01%.
On 1-year performance, GDE leads with 47.93% vs -39.41% for FBTC. On fees, GDE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GDE has been the lower-risk option at 8.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GDE has performed better with a 47.93% return vs -39.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FBTC.
GDE has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.
FBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GDE is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FBTC and 0.20% for GDE.
GDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBTC and GDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer