FBTC vs. GDE

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) and GDE (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate, while GDE is a Gold fund actively managed by WisdomTree. FBTC is passively managed, while GDE is actively managed. Over the past year, FBTC returned -44.68% vs 32.45% for GDE. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBTC charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for GDE.

Performance

FBTC vs. GDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBTC achieves a -25.63% return, which is significantly lower than GDE's -1.30% return.

FBTC

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: 3.51%
• 6M: -31.89%
• YTD: -25.63%
• 1Y: -44.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.64%

GDE

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -4.95%
• 6M: -7.43%
• YTD: -1.30%
• 1Y: 32.45%
• 3Y*: 39.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 29.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBTC vs. GDE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	-25.63%	-6.56%	94.28%
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund	-1.30%	73.76%	47.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FBTC and GDE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.32

Return for Risk

FBTC vs. GDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTC

FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

GDE

GDE Risk / Return Rank: 36
GDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
GDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GDE Omega Ratio Rank: 40
GDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
GDE Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBTC vs. GDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBTC	GDE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.01	1.06	-2.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.50	1.46	-2.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	1.21	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.84	1.44	-2.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.34	3.38	-4.72

FBTC vs. GDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBTC Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is lower than the GDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBTC and GDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBTC vs. GDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTC drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, which is greater than GDE's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC and GDE.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBTC	GDE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.35%	-32.01%	-21.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.35%	-22.66%	-30.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.20%	-20.14%	-28.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.73%	-8.16%	-9.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.39%	9.62%	+23.77%

Volatility

FBTC vs. GDE - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a higher volatility of 10.58% compared to WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) at 7.43%. This indicates that FBTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBTC	GDE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.58%	7.43%	+3.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.53%	26.34%	+8.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.30%	30.85%	+13.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.71%	27.10%	+22.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.71%	27.10%	+22.61%

FBTC vs. GDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GDE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FBTC vs. GDE - Dividend Comparison

FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund	4.38%	4.32%	7.14%	2.22%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBTC and GDE in my portfolio?

FBTC and GDE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBTC or GDE?

FBTC has higher volatility (10.58%) compared to GDE (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBTC dropped -53.35% vs GDE's -32.01%.

Which ETF is better, FBTC or GDE?

On 1-year performance, GDE leads with 32.45% vs -44.68% for FBTC. On fees, GDE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GDE has been the lower-risk option at 7.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FBTC or GDE?

Over the 1-year period, GDE has performed better with a 32.45% return vs -44.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBTC or GDE?

GDE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FBTC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBTC or GDE?

GDE has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.

What is the main difference between FBTC and GDE?

FBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GDE is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FBTC and 0.20% for GDE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.