FBTC vs. EWY
FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) and EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate, while EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FBTC returned -39.41% vs 189.48% for EWY. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBTC charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWY.
Performance
FBTC vs. EWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBTC achieves a -27.63% return, which is significantly lower than EWY's 90.95% return.
FBTC
- 1D
- 5.17%
- 1M
- -20.97%
- YTD
- -27.63%
- 6M
- -30.29%
- 1Y
- -39.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EWY
- 1D
- 5.96%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- 90.95%
- 6M
- 99.65%
- 1Y
- 189.48%
- 3Y*
- 44.08%
- 5Y*
- 17.62%
- 10Y*
- 15.79%
FBTC vs. EWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | -27.63% | -6.56% | 99.56% |
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 90.95% | 95.33% | -15.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBTC and EWY is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBTC vs. EWY — Risk / Return Rank
FBTC
EWY
FBTC vs. EWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBTC | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.58 | -0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | 8.26 | -9.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 29.84 | -31.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBTC | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 | 4.23 | -5.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.31 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
FBTC vs. EWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBTC drawdown since its inception was -52.07%, smaller than the maximum EWY drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC and EWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBTC | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.07% | -74.14% | +22.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.07% | -23.08% | -28.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.59% | -14.33% | -35.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.18% | -20.12% | +3.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.93% | 6.38% | +22.55% |
Volatility
FBTC vs. EWY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) is 11.77%, while iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a volatility of 25.98%. This indicates that FBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBTC | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.77% | 25.98% | -14.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.55% | 41.23% | -6.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.17% | 45.13% | -0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.26% | 29.70% | +20.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.26% | 27.83% | +22.43% |
FBTC vs. EWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBTC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EWY's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBTC vs. EWY - Dividend Comparison
FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.10% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBTC and EWY have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.98%) compared to FBTC (11.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBTC dropped -52.07% vs EWY's -74.14%.
On 1-year performance, EWY leads with 189.48% vs -39.41% for FBTC. On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FBTC has been the lower-risk option at 11.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EWY has performed better with a 189.48% return vs -39.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.
EWY has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.
FBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while EWY is Asia Pacific Equities. FBTC tracks Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate, while EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FBTC and 0.59% for EWY.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBTC and EWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer