FBTC vs. BTC
FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) and BTC (Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. FBTC is passively managed, while BTC is actively managed. Over the past year, FBTC returned -38.65% vs -38.61% for BTC. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FBTC charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BTC.
Performance
FBTC vs. BTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FBTC having a -25.34% return and BTC slightly lower at -25.36%.
FBTC
- 1D
- -2.65%
- 1M
- -18.37%
- YTD
- -25.34%
- 6M
- -29.78%
- 1Y
- -38.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTC
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -18.40%
- YTD
- -25.36%
- 6M
- -29.74%
- 1Y
- -38.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBTC vs. BTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | -25.34% | -6.56% | 42.97% |
BTC Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF | -25.36% | -7.50% | 44.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBTC and BTC is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024 | 1.00 |
The correlation between FBTC and BTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBTC vs. BTC — Risk / Return Rank
FBTC
BTC
FBTC vs. BTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBTC | BTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | -0.78 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | -1.36 | 0.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBTC | BTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | -0.89 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | -0.00 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
FBTC vs. BTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBTC drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, roughly equal to the maximum BTC drawdown of -49.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC and BTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBTC | BTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.33% | -49.34% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.33% | -49.34% | +0.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.00% | -47.98% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.01% | -16.61% | +0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.41% | 28.38% | +0.03% |
Volatility
FBTC vs. BTC - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC) have volatilities of 9.39% and 9.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBTC | BTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.39% | 9.40% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.38% | 34.45% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.61% | 43.69% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.13% | 48.30% | +1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.13% | 48.30% | +1.83% |
FBTC vs. BTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBTC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BTC's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FBTC vs. BTC - Dividend Comparison
Neither FBTC nor BTC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, FBTC and BTC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BTC has higher volatility (9.40%) compared to FBTC (9.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBTC dropped -49.33% vs BTC's -49.34%.
On 1-year performance, BTC leads with -38.61% vs -38.65% for FBTC. On fees, BTC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTC has performed better with a -38.61% return vs -38.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BTC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FBTC.
FBTC and BTC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FBTC and 0.15% for BTC.
BTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.89 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBTC and BTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer