FBTAX vs. ETHSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A (FBTAX) and Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX).
FBTAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 27, 2000. ETHSX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Jul 25, 1985.
Performance
FBTAX vs. ETHSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FBTAX vs. ETHSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBTAX Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A | 2.24% | 39.54% | 5.37% | 10.70% | -7.95% | -3.10% | 32.17% | 25.74% | -3.86% | 25.80% |
ETHSX Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund | -5.95% | 10.23% | 3.48% | 5.67% | -9.41% | 22.02% | 13.04% | 25.99% | 5.87% | 16.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBTAX achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly higher than ETHSX's -5.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FBTAX has outperformed ETHSX with an annualized return of 11.86%, while ETHSX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.59% annualized return.
FBTAX
- 1D
- 5.08%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 15.54%
- 1Y
- 55.40%
- 3Y*
- 20.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
ETHSX
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- -6.44%
- YTD
- -5.95%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 1.32%
- 3Y*
- 4.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.55%
- 10Y*
- 7.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FBTAX vs. ETHSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBTAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHSX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FBTAX vs. ETHSX — Risk / Return Rank
FBTAX
ETHSX
FBTAX vs. ETHSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A (FBTAX) and Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBTAX | ETHSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | 0.01 | +1.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 0.14 | +2.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.02 | +0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 0.03 | +3.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.63 | 0.07 | +12.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBTAX | ETHSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 0.01 | +1.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.31 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.47 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.03 | +0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between FBTAX and ETHSX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FBTAX vs. ETHSX - Dividend Comparison
FBTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than ETHSX's 7.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBTAX Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A | 1.42% | 1.45% | 6.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 20.12% | 8.37% | 6.77% | 2.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.36% |
ETHSX Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund | 7.83% | 7.36% | 4.81% | 2.48% | 4.43% | 8.25% | 7.33% | 5.39% | 5.51% | 2.82% | 12.75% | 9.70% |
Drawdowns
FBTAX vs. ETHSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBTAX drawdown since its inception was -63.55%, smaller than the maximum ETHSX drawdown of -90.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTAX and ETHSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBTAX | ETHSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.55% | -90.06% | +26.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.60% | -11.26% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.51% | -19.58% | -16.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.82% | -27.43% | -11.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | -10.46% | +7.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.34% | -53.13% | +31.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 4.52% | -0.81% |
Volatility
FBTAX vs. ETHSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A (FBTAX) has a higher volatility of 9.36% compared to Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX) at 5.09%. This indicates that FBTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETHSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FBTAX | ETHSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.36% | 5.09% | +4.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.00% | 10.50% | +6.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.00% | 17.73% | +8.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.32% | 14.74% | +8.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.59% | 16.25% | +8.34% |