FBRNX vs. BLUEX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FBRNX (Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class I) and BLUEX (AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FBRNX returned 15.24%/yr vs 9.28%/yr for BLUEX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FBRNX charges 0.62%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for BLUEX.

Performance

FBRNX vs. BLUEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class I (FBRNX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBRNX achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly higher than BLUEX's -7.48% return. Over the past 10 years, FBRNX has outperformed BLUEX with an annualized return of 15.24%, while BLUEX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.28% annualized return.

FBRNX

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 4.32%
• YTD: 15.11%
• 6M: 15.54%
• 1Y: 36.34%
• 3Y*: 22.56%
• 5Y*: 12.74%
• 10Y*: 15.24%

BLUEX

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -1.43%
• YTD: -7.48%
• 6M: -6.51%
• 1Y: -7.44%
• 3Y*: 3.08%
• 5Y*: 0.03%
• 10Y*: 9.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBRNX vs. BLUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FBRNX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class I	15.11%	18.84%	19.74%	26.90%	-19.59%	22.96%	24.89%	32.20%	-8.66%	24.44%
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	-7.48%	4.45%	7.24%	14.35%	-14.30%	3.22%	34.74%	35.34%	-4.91%	27.86%

Correlation

The correlation between FBRNX and BLUEX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between FBRNX and BLUEX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FBRNX vs. BLUEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBRNX

FBRNX Risk / Return Rank: 85
FBRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FBRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FBRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FBRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FBRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

BLUEX

BLUEX Risk / Return Rank: 1
BLUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBRNX vs. BLUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class I (FBRNX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBRNX	BLUEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.82	-0.72	+3.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.80	-0.95	+4.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	0.89	+0.62
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.98	-0.59	+4.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.28	-1.46	+20.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FBRNX vs. BLUEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBRNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the BLUEX Sharpe Ratio of -0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBRNX and BLUEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBRNX	BLUEX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.82	-0.72	+3.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.00	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82	0.56	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.49	+0.34

Drawdowns

FBRNX vs. BLUEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBRNX drawdown since its inception was -34.37%, smaller than the maximum BLUEX drawdown of -54.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBRNX and BLUEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBRNX	BLUEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.37%	-54.27%	+19.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.21%	-12.19%	+2.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.87%	-12.19%	-8.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.29%	-21.87%	-3.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.37%	-29.06%	-5.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	-9.40%	+8.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.43%	-13.36%	+8.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	4.88%	-2.98%

Volatility

FBRNX vs. BLUEX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class I (FBRNX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) have volatilities of 3.46% and 3.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBRNX	BLUEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.46%	3.58%	-0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.01%	7.80%	+2.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.00%	10.03%	+2.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.76%	10.63%	+7.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.56%	16.59%	+1.97%

FBRNX vs. BLUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBRNX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than BLUEX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBRNX vs. BLUEX - Dividend Comparison

FBRNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, more than BLUEX's 0.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	0.34%	0.31%	0.29%	0.03%	11.84%	27.20%	25.43%	13.71%	13.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.24%
FBRNX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class I	3.99%	4.60%	4.66%	1.94%	0.35%	0.00%	5.15%	5.28%	4.39%	3.07%	0.99%	5.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBRNX and BLUEX in my portfolio?

FBRNX and BLUEX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBRNX or BLUEX?

BLUEX has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to FBRNX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBRNX dropped -34.37% vs BLUEX's -54.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBRNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.