FBPEX vs. GQHPX
FBPEX (Cantor FBP Equity & Dividend Plus Fund) and GQHPX (GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past year, FBPEX returned 19.19% vs 11.82% for GQHPX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FBPEX charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for GQHPX.
Performance
FBPEX vs. GQHPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FBPEX having a 9.74% return and GQHPX slightly higher at 10.15%.
FBPEX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 10.90%
- 1Y
- 19.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GQHPX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 6M
- 10.63%
- 1Y
- 11.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBPEX vs. GQHPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FBPEX Cantor FBP Equity & Dividend Plus Fund | 9.74% | 10.80% | 12.18% | 6.24% |
GQHPX GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund | 10.15% | 7.53% | 12.69% | 3.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBPEX and GQHPX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2023 | 0.62 |
The correlation between FBPEX and GQHPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBPEX vs. GQHPX — Risk / Return Rank
FBPEX
GQHPX
FBPEX vs. GQHPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cantor FBP Equity & Dividend Plus Fund (FBPEX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBPEX | GQHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.20 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 2.29 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.93 | 5.73 | +3.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBPEX | GQHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 1.19 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 0.84 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
FBPEX vs. GQHPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBPEX drawdown since its inception was -12.78%, smaller than the maximum GQHPX drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBPEX and GQHPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBPEX | GQHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.78% | -17.26% | +4.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.38% | -5.08% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -3.59% | +3.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.97% | -3.35% | +1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 2.03% | +0.24% |
Volatility
FBPEX vs. GQHPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cantor FBP Equity & Dividend Plus Fund (FBPEX) is 3.01%, while GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that FBPEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GQHPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBPEX | GQHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 3.49% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.56% | 7.72% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.35% | 9.77% | +0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.73% | 12.66% | -0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.73% | 12.66% | -0.93% |
FBPEX vs. GQHPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBPEX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than GQHPX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBPEX vs. GQHPX - Dividend Comparison
FBPEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.69%, more than GQHPX's 3.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBPEX Cantor FBP Equity & Dividend Plus Fund | 9.69% | 9.53% | 11.78% | 4.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GQHPX GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund | 3.62% | 2.98% | 3.14% | 2.64% | 3.24% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBPEX and GQHPX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GQHPX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to FBPEX (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBPEX dropped -12.78% vs GQHPX's -17.26%.
FBPEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBPEX and GQHPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer