FBOT vs. TSXU
FBOT (Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - FBOT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). FBOT is actively managed, while TSXU is passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FBOT charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
FBOT vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBOT achieves a 20.06% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 141.91% return.
FBOT
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 20.06%
- 6M
- 21.90%
- 1Y
- 39.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 66.50%
- YTD
- 141.91%
- 6M
- 130.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBOT vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FBOT Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF | 20.06% | 1.69% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 141.91% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBOT and TSXU is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBOT vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
FBOT
TSXU
FBOT vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBOT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.50 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBOT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 4.53 | -3.72 |
Drawdowns
FBOT vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBOT drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum TSXU drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBOT and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBOT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.61% | -35.62% | +12.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -0.92% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.15% | -10.56% | +5.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.81% | — | — |
Volatility
FBOT vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBOT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.00% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.25% | 78.68% | -58.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.95% | 78.68% | -57.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.95% | 78.68% | -57.73% |
FBOT vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBOT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBOT vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
FBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than TSXU's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FBOT Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF | 0.59% | 0.81% | 0.31% | 0.20% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.20% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBOT and TSXU have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FBOT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FBOT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.59% for FBOT.
FBOT is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FBOT and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for FBOT and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer