FBOT vs. TSXU
FBOT (Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - FBOT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). FBOT is actively managed, while TSXU is passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FBOT charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
FBOT vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBOT achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 113.86% return.
FBOT
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -3.43%
- YTD
- 13.70%
- 6M
- 12.72%
- 1Y
- 30.04%
- 3Y*
- 15.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 19.91%
- YTD
- 113.86%
- 6M
- 113.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBOT vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FBOT Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF | 13.70% | 2.08% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 113.86% | 37.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBOT and TSXU is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBOT vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
FBOT
TSXU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FBOT vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBOT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.65 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBOT vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBOT drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum TSXU drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBOT and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBOT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.61% | -35.62% | +12.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.68% | -13.54% | +7.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.12% | -10.68% | +5.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | — | — |
Volatility
FBOT vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBOT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.13% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.40% | 89.41% | -68.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.20% | 89.41% | -68.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.20% | 89.41% | -68.21% |
FBOT vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBOT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBOT vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
FBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than TSXU's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FBOT Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF | 0.44% | 0.81% | 0.31% | 0.20% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.64% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBOT and TSXU have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FBOT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FBOT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.44% for FBOT.
FBOT is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FBOT and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for FBOT and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer