PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBOT vs. FBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FBOT vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FBOT vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FBOT
Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF
1.30%19.15%12.58%-1.03%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
0.12%7.57%2.13%4.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBOT achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's 0.12% return.


FBOT

1D
1.91%
1M
-8.72%
YTD
1.30%
6M
3.00%
1Y
30.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBND

1D
-0.02%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.77%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
1.01%
10Y*
2.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FBOT vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBOT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FBOT vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBOT
FBOT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FBND
FBND Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBOT vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBOTFBNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.28

1.03

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.86

1.44

+0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.18

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

1.69

+0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.62

5.25

+2.37

FBOT vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBOT and FBND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBOTFBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

1.03

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.44

+0.10

Correlation

The correlation between FBOT and FBND is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FBOT vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

FBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than FBND's 4.73% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBOT
Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF
0.69%0.81%0.31%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
4.73%4.70%4.73%4.26%3.07%1.86%4.25%2.90%2.93%2.56%2.84%3.26%

Drawdowns

FBOT vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBOT drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBOT and FBND.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FBOTFBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.61%

-17.25%

-6.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.17%

-2.79%

-12.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.71%

-1.80%

-7.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.33%

-3.38%

-1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

0.90%

+3.15%

Volatility

FBOT vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) has a higher volatility of 9.04% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.66%. This indicates that FBOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FBOTFBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.04%

1.66%

+7.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.86%

2.62%

+13.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.81%

4.44%

+19.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.81%

5.90%

+14.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.81%

6.08%

+14.73%