PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBNTX vs. PBDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBNTX vs. PBDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class M (FBNTX) and T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund (PBDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBNTX achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly higher than PBDIX's 0.55% return.


FBNTX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.07%
6M
0.67%
YTD
0.67%
1Y
3.02%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
2.03%
10Y*

PBDIX

1D
-0.42%
1M
-0.00%
6M
0.55%
YTD
0.55%
1Y
3.78%
3Y*
6.01%
5Y*
1.21%
10Y*
2.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBNTX vs. PBDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBNTX
Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class M
0.67%5.14%4.62%4.72%-4.00%-1.08%3.60%3.98%0.96%0.95%
PBDIX
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund
0.55%8.29%4.75%8.62%-14.24%-1.45%8.17%8.69%-0.01%3.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FBNTX and PBDIX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2016

0.67

The correlation between FBNTX and PBDIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBNTX vs. PBDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBNTX
FBNTX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FBNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FBNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

PBDIX
PBDIX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PBDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
PBDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBNTX vs. PBDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class M (FBNTX) and T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund (PBDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBNTXPBDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.16

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

1.28

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.16

3.60

+4.55

FBNTX vs. PBDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBNTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the PBDIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBNTX and PBDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBNTX vs. PBDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBNTX drawdown since its inception was -6.64%, smaller than the maximum PBDIX drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBNTX and PBDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBNTXPBDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

-19.20%

+12.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

-2.94%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.29%

-5.61%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.40%

-19.10%

+12.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-1.25%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.01%

-2.16%

+1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

1.04%

-0.68%

Volatility

FBNTX vs. PBDIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class M (FBNTX) is 0.54%, while T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund (PBDIX) has a volatility of 1.23%. This indicates that FBNTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBNTXPBDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

1.23%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.35%

3.22%

-1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87%

4.17%

-2.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.17%

6.13%

-3.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.82%

5.03%

-3.21%

FBNTX vs. PBDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBNTX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PBDIX's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBNTX vs. PBDIX - Dividend Comparison

FBNTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than PBDIX's 4.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBNTX
Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class M
3.95%4.05%3.79%2.53%0.67%0.87%2.51%1.92%1.54%1.06%0.40%0.00%
PBDIX
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund
4.27%5.19%7.21%6.39%2.01%1.84%3.59%3.18%2.94%2.75%2.82%2.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBNTX and PBDIX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBDIX has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to FBNTX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBNTX dropped -6.64% vs PBDIX's -19.20%.

FBNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBNTX and PBDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer