FBNIX vs. FIWDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FBNIX (Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class I) and FIWDX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z) are both Total Bond Market funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FBNIX returned 2.18%/yr vs 3.33%/yr for FIWDX. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FBNIX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FIWDX.

Performance

FBNIX vs. FIWDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class I (FBNIX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z (FIWDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBNIX achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than FIWDX's 3.40% return.

FBNIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 0.68%
• 6M: 1.00%
• 1Y: 3.74%
• 3Y*: 4.72%
• 5Y*: 2.18%
• 10Y*: —

FIWDX

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 1.18%
• YTD: 3.40%
• 6M: 3.74%
• 1Y: 9.97%
• 3Y*: 8.16%
• 5Y*: 3.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBNIX vs. FIWDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FBNIX Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class I	0.68%	5.36%	4.85%	4.91%	-3.90%	-0.97%	3.76%	4.15%	0.87%
FIWDX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z	3.40%	8.98%	6.07%	9.20%	-11.76%	3.51%	7.60%	11.20%	-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FBNIX and FIWDX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018	0.55

The correlation between FBNIX and FIWDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FBNIX vs. FIWDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBNIX

FBNIX Risk / Return Rank: 63
FBNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
FBNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FBNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FBNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
FBNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

FIWDX

FIWDX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FIWDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FIWDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FIWDX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FIWDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FIWDX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBNIX vs. FIWDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class I (FBNIX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z (FIWDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBNIX	FIWDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	2.96	-0.97
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.71	4.57	-0.86
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.64	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	3.98	-1.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.14	17.17	-6.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FBNIX vs. FIWDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBNIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is lower than the FIWDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBNIX and FIWDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBNIX	FIWDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.99	2.96	-0.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00	0.74	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.13	0.93	+0.20

Drawdowns

FBNIX vs. FIWDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBNIX drawdown since its inception was -6.47%, smaller than the maximum FIWDX drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBNIX and FIWDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBNIX	FIWDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.47%	-15.96%	+9.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.29%	-2.61%	+1.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.29%	-3.97%	+2.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.28%	-15.96%	+9.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	0.00%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.95%	-3.20%	+2.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.34%	0.60%	-0.26%

Volatility

FBNIX vs. FIWDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class I (FBNIX) is 0.54%, while Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z (FIWDX) has a volatility of 1.39%. This indicates that FBNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIWDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBNIX	FIWDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.54%	1.39%	-0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.33%	2.93%	-1.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89%	3.51%	-1.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.19%	4.54%	-2.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.84%	4.88%	-3.04%

FBNIX vs. FIWDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBNIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FIWDX's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBNIX vs. FIWDX - Dividend Comparison

FBNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, less than FIWDX's 4.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FBNIX Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class I	4.17%	4.26%	4.00%	2.71%	0.78%	0.99%	2.67%	2.09%	1.72%	1.21%	0.48%
FIWDX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z	4.34%	4.39%	4.21%	4.02%	2.99%	4.28%	4.62%	4.39%	1.13%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBNIX and FIWDX in my portfolio?

FBNIX and FIWDX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBNIX or FIWDX?

FIWDX has higher volatility (1.39%) compared to FBNIX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBNIX dropped -6.47% vs FIWDX's -15.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIWDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.