PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBNDX vs. STWTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBNDX vs. STWTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond Fund (STWTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBNDX achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than STWTX's 1.28% return. Over the past 10 years, FBNDX has outperformed STWTX with an annualized return of 2.11%, while STWTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.73% annualized return.


FBNDX

1D
0.42%
1M
0.89%
YTD
0.62%
6M
0.80%
1Y
4.25%
3Y*
4.18%
5Y*
0.13%
10Y*
2.11%

STWTX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.10%
YTD
1.28%
6M
1.33%
1Y
6.59%
3Y*
2.41%
5Y*
0.34%
10Y*
1.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBNDX vs. STWTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBNDX
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund
0.62%7.37%0.93%6.51%-14.04%-1.13%9.79%9.82%-0.35%3.92%
STWTX
Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond Fund
1.28%1.67%1.33%6.86%-8.46%0.01%6.01%7.59%0.34%4.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FBNDX and STWTX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2011

0.62

The correlation between FBNDX and STWTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBNDX vs. STWTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBNDX
FBNDX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FBNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FBNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

STWTX
STWTX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
STWTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STWTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
STWTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
STWTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
STWTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBNDX vs. STWTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond Fund (STWTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBNDXSTWTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.45

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

1.98

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.93

5.94

-2.02

FBNDX vs. STWTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBNDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the STWTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBNDX and STWTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBNDX vs. STWTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBNDX drawdown since its inception was -42.76%, which is greater than STWTX's maximum drawdown of -14.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBNDX and STWTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBNDXSTWTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.76%

-14.44%

-28.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.02%

-3.34%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.09%

-8.66%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.74%

-14.44%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.74%

-14.44%

-4.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-0.98%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.33%

-2.60%

-7.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

1.11%

-0.03%

Volatility

FBNDX vs. STWTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) has a higher volatility of 1.24% compared to Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond Fund (STWTX) at 0.71%. This indicates that FBNDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STWTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBNDXSTWTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

0.71%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.02%

2.31%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.10%

3.22%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.04%

4.96%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.03%

3.93%

+1.10%

FBNDX vs. STWTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBNDX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than STWTX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBNDX vs. STWTX - Dividend Comparison

FBNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than STWTX's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBNDX
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund
3.90%3.87%3.34%3.56%1.98%1.34%4.70%2.75%2.86%2.18%2.72%2.66%
STWTX
Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond Fund
3.41%2.90%3.20%3.01%2.20%2.61%2.90%4.34%3.47%2.03%2.85%2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBNDX and STWTX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBNDX has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to STWTX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBNDX dropped -42.76% vs STWTX's -14.44%.

STWTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBNDX and STWTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer