PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBNDX vs. FMBPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBNDX vs. FMBPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) and Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBNDX achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than FMBPX's 0.92% return. Over the past 10 years, FBNDX has outperformed FMBPX with an annualized return of 2.11%, while FMBPX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.44% annualized return.


FBNDX

1D
0.42%
1M
0.89%
YTD
0.62%
6M
0.80%
1Y
4.25%
3Y*
4.18%
5Y*
0.13%
10Y*
2.11%

FMBPX

1D
0.47%
1M
0.77%
YTD
0.92%
6M
1.33%
1Y
6.39%
3Y*
4.53%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
1.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBNDX vs. FMBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBNDX
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund
0.62%7.37%0.93%6.51%-14.04%-1.13%9.79%9.82%-0.35%3.92%
FMBPX
Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio
0.92%9.03%1.04%4.44%-12.21%-1.35%4.77%6.30%1.13%2.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FBNDX and FMBPX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2009

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between FBNDX and FMBPX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBNDX vs. FMBPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBNDX
FBNDX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FBNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FBNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

FMBPX
FMBPX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FMBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FMBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBNDX vs. FMBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) and Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBNDXFMBPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.30

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

2.16

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.93

6.86

-2.93

FBNDX vs. FMBPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBNDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the FMBPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBNDX and FMBPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBNDX vs. FMBPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBNDX drawdown since its inception was -42.76%, which is greater than FMBPX's maximum drawdown of -18.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBNDX and FMBPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBNDXFMBPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.76%

-18.34%

-24.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.02%

-3.15%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.09%

-7.69%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.74%

-18.02%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.74%

-18.34%

-0.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-1.11%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.33%

-3.26%

-7.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

0.99%

+0.09%

Volatility

FBNDX vs. FMBPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) is 1.24%, while Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX) has a volatility of 1.38%. This indicates that FBNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMBPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBNDXFMBPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

1.38%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.02%

3.32%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.10%

4.60%

-0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.04%

6.79%

-0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.03%

5.13%

-0.10%

FBNDX vs. FMBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBNDX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FMBPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBNDX vs. FMBPX - Dividend Comparison

FBNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, less than FMBPX's 5.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBNDX
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund
3.90%3.87%3.34%3.56%1.98%1.34%4.70%2.75%2.86%2.18%2.72%2.66%
FMBPX
Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio
5.02%4.87%4.29%3.46%2.29%1.96%2.68%3.23%3.14%2.83%2.72%2.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBNDX and FMBPX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMBPX has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to FBNDX (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBNDX dropped -42.76% vs FMBPX's -18.34%.

FMBPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBNDX and FMBPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer