FBND vs. FDHY
FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) and FDHY (Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FDHY is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FBND returned 0.83%/yr vs 3.99%/yr for FDHY. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBND charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDHY.
Performance
FBND vs. FDHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBND achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than FDHY's 2.16% return.
FBND
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 5.59%
- 3Y*
- 4.70%
- 5Y*
- 0.83%
- 10Y*
- 2.56%
FDHY
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 8.50%
- 3Y*
- 8.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.99%
- 10Y*
- —
FBND vs. FDHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.50% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -12.54% | -0.43% | 9.41% | 9.82% | 1.15% |
FDHY Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF | 2.16% | 9.24% | 7.53% | 11.14% | -11.30% | 4.33% | 10.71% | 16.87% | -2.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBND and FDHY is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2018 | 0.42 |
The correlation between FBND and FDHY shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.57 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FBND vs. FDHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FBND
FDHY
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Energy
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Industrials
FBND
FDHY
-
Utilities
FBND
FDHY
-
Energy
FBND
FDHY
Financial Services
FBND
FDHY
-
Basic Materials
FBND
-
FDHY
-
Communication Services
FBND
-
FDHY
-
Consumer Cyclical
FBND
-
FDHY
-
Consumer Defensive
FBND
-
FDHY
-
Healthcare
FBND
-
FDHY
-
Real Estate
FBND
-
FDHY
-
Technology
FBND
-
FDHY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBND vs. FDHY — Risk / Return Rank
FBND
FDHY
FBND vs. FDHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) and Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBND | FDHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.49 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 4.02 | -1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.37 | 17.11 | -10.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBND | FDHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 2.40 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.56 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.72 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
FBND vs. FDHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBND drawdown since its inception was -17.25%, smaller than the maximum FDHY drawdown of -20.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBND and FDHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBND | FDHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.25% | -20.01% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.66% | -2.12% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.94% | -5.26% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.25% | -16.38% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -0.24% | -1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -2.88% | -0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 0.50% | +0.38% |
Volatility
FBND vs. FDHY - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) and Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY) have volatilities of 1.27% and 1.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBND | FDHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 1.23% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.73% | 2.75% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.86% | 3.57% | +0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 7.13% | -1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.10% | 8.05% | -1.95% |
FBND vs. FDHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBND has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FDHY's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBND vs. FDHY - Dividend Comparison
FBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, less than FDHY's 6.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.70% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
FDHY Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF | 6.52% | 6.56% | 6.58% | 6.26% | 5.34% | 6.09% | 5.78% | 4.94% | 2.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBND and FDHY have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBND has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to FDHY (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBND dropped -17.25% vs FDHY's -20.01%.
On 5-year performance, FDHY leads with 3.99% vs 0.83% for FBND. On fees, FBND is cheaper at 0.36% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDHY has performed better with a 3.99% return vs 0.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FBND is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDHY.
FDHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.52%, compared with 4.70% for FBND.
FBND is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while FDHY is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FBND and 0.45% for FDHY.
FDHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBND and FDHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer