PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBND vs. BRTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FBND vs. BRTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) and Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FBND vs. BRTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
0.12%7.57%2.13%0.56%
BRTR
Blackrock Total Return ETF
-0.32%8.11%1.29%0.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBND achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly higher than BRTR's -0.32% return.


FBND

1D
-0.02%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.77%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
1.01%
10Y*
2.78%

BRTR

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
-0.32%
6M
0.67%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FBND vs. BRTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBND has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than BRTR's 0.38% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FBND vs. BRTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBND
FBND Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

BRTR
BRTR Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BRTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
BRTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBND vs. BRTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) and Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBNDBRTRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.03

1.07

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.44

1.49

-0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.19

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

1.45

+0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.25

4.89

+0.37

FBND vs. BRTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the BRTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBND and BRTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBNDBRTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

1.07

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.87

-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between FBND and BRTR is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FBND vs. BRTR - Dividend Comparison

FBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, less than BRTR's 4.84% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
4.73%4.70%4.73%4.26%3.07%1.86%4.25%2.90%2.93%2.56%2.84%3.26%
BRTR
Blackrock Total Return ETF
4.84%4.86%5.58%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FBND vs. BRTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBND drawdown since its inception was -17.25%, which is greater than BRTR's maximum drawdown of -5.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBND and BRTR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FBNDBRTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.25%

-5.07%

-12.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-3.26%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-2.39%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

-1.32%

-2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

0.97%

-0.07%

Volatility

FBND vs. BRTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) is 1.66%, while Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR) has a volatility of 1.75%. This indicates that FBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FBNDBRTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

1.75%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.62%

2.59%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.44%

4.28%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.90%

4.75%

+1.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.08%

4.75%

+1.33%