PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBND vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBND vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBND achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -3.11% return. Over the past 10 years, FBND has underperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 2.47%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively higher 13.14% annualized return.


FBND

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
0.10%
6M
0.40%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
2.47%

BRK-B

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.32%
YTD
-3.11%
6M
-2.06%
1Y
-1.32%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
13.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBND vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
0.10%7.57%2.13%6.81%-12.54%-0.43%9.41%9.82%-0.57%3.52%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-3.11%10.89%27.09%15.46%3.31%28.95%2.37%10.93%3.01%21.62%

Correlation

The correlation between FBND and BRK-B is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2014

-0.02

The correlation between FBND and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.11 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBND vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBND
FBND Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBND vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBNDBRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.00

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

-0.14

+2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.97

-0.30

+6.27

FBND vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBND and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBNDBRK-BDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

-0.09

+1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.65

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.68

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.48

-0.04

Drawdowns

FBND vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBND drawdown since its inception was -17.25%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBND and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBNDBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.25%

-53.86%

+36.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

-9.42%

+6.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.94%

-14.95%

+9.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.25%

-26.58%

+9.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.25%

-29.57%

+12.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-9.78%

+7.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.35%

-11.07%

+7.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

4.49%

-3.59%

Volatility

FBND vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) is 1.23%, while Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that FBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBNDBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

3.98%

-2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.75%

10.87%

-8.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.80%

14.38%

-10.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.92%

17.13%

-11.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.10%

19.44%

-13.34%

Dividends

FBND vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

FBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
4.72%4.70%4.73%4.26%3.07%1.86%4.25%2.90%2.93%2.56%2.84%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBND and BRK-B have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRK-B has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to FBND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBND dropped -17.25% vs BRK-B's -53.86%.

FBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBND and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer