PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBND vs. APCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FBND vs. APCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) and ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FBND vs. APCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
0.14%7.57%2.13%2.64%
APCB
ActivePassive Core Bond ETF
-0.22%6.87%1.45%1.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBND achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly higher than APCB's -0.22% return.


FBND

1D
0.31%
1M
-1.78%
YTD
0.14%
6M
1.01%
1Y
4.73%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
1.01%
10Y*
2.79%

APCB

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.91%
YTD
-0.22%
6M
0.90%
1Y
4.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FBND vs. APCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FBND and APCB have an expense ratio of 0.36%.


Return for Risk

FBND vs. APCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBND
FBND Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

APCB
APCB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
APCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
APCB Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
APCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
APCB Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBND vs. APCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) and ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBNDAPCBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

1.05

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.50

1.47

+0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.19

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

1.70

+0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.71

5.23

+0.49

FBND vs. APCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the APCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBND and APCB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBNDAPCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

1.05

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.67

-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between FBND and APCB is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FBND vs. APCB - Dividend Comparison

FBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than APCB's 4.32% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
4.73%4.70%4.73%4.26%3.07%1.86%4.25%2.90%2.93%2.56%2.84%3.26%
APCB
ActivePassive Core Bond ETF
4.32%4.35%4.74%2.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FBND vs. APCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBND drawdown since its inception was -17.25%, which is greater than APCB's maximum drawdown of -6.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBND and APCB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FBNDAPCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.25%

-6.42%

-10.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-2.51%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-1.91%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

-1.51%

-1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.82%

+0.07%

Volatility

FBND vs. APCB - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) has a higher volatility of 1.66% compared to ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) at 1.48%. This indicates that FBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FBNDAPCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

1.48%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.62%

2.32%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.45%

3.90%

+0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.90%

4.91%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.09%

4.91%

+1.18%