FBNAX vs. FBGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class A (FBNAX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX).
FBNAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 12, 2016. FBGRX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1987.
Performance
FBNAX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FBNAX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBNAX Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class A | -0.11% | 5.15% | 4.63% | 4.72% | -4.00% | -1.08% | 3.61% | 4.01% | 1.00% | 0.95% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | -7.12% | 19.91% | 39.77% | 55.61% | -38.45% | 22.64% | 62.20% | 33.43% | 1.02% | 36.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBNAX achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's -7.12% return.
FBNAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.73%
- 1Y
- 3.39%
- 3Y*
- 4.33%
- 5Y*
- 1.91%
- 10Y*
- —
FBGRX
- 1D
- 4.54%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- -7.12%
- 6M
- -4.04%
- 1Y
- 26.78%
- 3Y*
- 26.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.74%
- 10Y*
- 19.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FBNAX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBNAX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FBNAX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank
FBNAX
FBGRX
FBNAX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class A (FBNAX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBNAX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.77 | 1.13 | +0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.08 | 1.73 | +1.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.25 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 2.00 | +1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.17 | 7.92 | +4.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBNAX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 1.13 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.47 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 0.65 | +0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between FBNAX and FBGRX is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
FBNAX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison
FBNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than FBGRX's 2.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBNAX Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class A | 3.70% | 4.06% | 3.79% | 2.53% | 0.67% | 0.87% | 2.52% | 1.94% | 1.58% | 1.07% | 0.41% | 0.00% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 2.05% | 1.90% | 5.95% | 0.93% | 0.57% | 8.73% | 6.40% | 3.70% | 6.32% | 4.23% | 4.05% | 5.30% |
Drawdowns
FBNAX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBNAX drawdown since its inception was -6.64%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBNAX and FBGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBNAX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.64% | -58.64% | +52.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.29% | -13.89% | +12.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.42% | -43.08% | +36.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -8.68% | +7.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.03% | -12.58% | +11.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.32% | 3.51% | -3.19% |
Volatility
FBNAX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class A (FBNAX) is 0.57%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 7.83%. This indicates that FBNAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FBNAX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.57% | 7.83% | -7.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.26% | 14.08% | -12.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97% | 24.98% | -23.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.12% | 24.93% | -22.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.81% | 23.63% | -21.82% |