FBMPX vs. PRMTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX) and T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund (PRMTX).
FBMPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 29, 1986. PRMTX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Oct 12, 1993.
Performance
FBMPX vs. PRMTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FBMPX vs. PRMTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBMPX Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio | -11.69% | 37.07% | 35.98% | 56.85% | -38.30% | 15.97% | 35.48% | 33.14% | -3.52% | 12.60% |
PRMTX T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund | -10.21% | 43.31% | 48.75% | 39.30% | -40.90% | 9.81% | 53.69% | 35.69% | -1.85% | 33.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBMPX achieves a -11.69% return, which is significantly lower than PRMTX's -10.21% return. Over the past 10 years, FBMPX has underperformed PRMTX with an annualized return of 14.79%, while PRMTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.68% annualized return.
FBMPX
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -11.49%
- YTD
- -11.69%
- 6M
- -9.17%
- 1Y
- 27.49%
- 3Y*
- 28.69%
- 5Y*
- 11.04%
- 10Y*
- 14.79%
PRMTX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -8.96%
- YTD
- -10.21%
- 6M
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- 33.32%
- 3Y*
- 32.51%
- 5Y*
- 11.53%
- 10Y*
- 17.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FBMPX vs. PRMTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBMPX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than PRMTX's 0.77% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FBMPX vs. PRMTX — Risk / Return Rank
FBMPX
PRMTX
FBMPX vs. PRMTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX) and T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund (PRMTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBMPX | PRMTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 0.86 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.77 | 2.77 | -1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.36 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 2.68 | -1.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.33 | 7.58 | -2.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBMPX | PRMTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 0.86 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.44 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.75 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.64 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between FBMPX and PRMTX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FBMPX vs. PRMTX - Dividend Comparison
FBMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.16%, less than PRMTX's 56.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBMPX Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio | 9.16% | 8.09% | 7.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.88% | 3.74% | 35.43% | 15.29% | 5.53% | 7.50% | 7.29% |
PRMTX T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund | 56.15% | 50.42% | 14.78% | 7.74% | 17.50% | 8.35% | 5.29% | 2.45% | 1.28% | 2.35% | 2.24% | 3.20% |
Drawdowns
FBMPX vs. PRMTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBMPX drawdown since its inception was -61.77%, smaller than the maximum PRMTX drawdown of -66.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBMPX and PRMTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBMPX | PRMTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.77% | -66.30% | +4.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.90% | -11.17% | -5.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.42% | -47.17% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.42% | -47.17% | -0.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.90% | -11.17% | -5.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.66% | -13.92% | +3.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.40% | 3.95% | +0.45% |
Volatility
FBMPX vs. PRMTX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund (PRMTX) at 5.26%. This indicates that FBMPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRMTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FBMPX | PRMTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | 5.26% | +1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.79% | 31.59% | -17.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.07% | 39.00% | -15.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.13% | 26.54% | -3.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.83% | 23.51% | -1.68% |