PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBK vs. FSPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FBK vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FB Financial Corporation (FBK) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FBK vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBK
FB Financial Corporation
-6.60%9.99%31.42%12.32%-16.50%27.53%-11.14%14.04%-16.18%61.13%
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
-13.03%18.54%33.27%42.77%-29.17%27.57%38.46%36.38%-1.79%27.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBK achieves a -6.60% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's -13.03% return.


FBK

1D
0.80%
1M
-5.03%
YTD
-6.60%
6M
-6.17%
1Y
13.73%
3Y*
20.66%
5Y*
4.57%
10Y*

FSPGX

1D
-0.45%
1M
-8.63%
YTD
-13.03%
6M
-12.06%
1Y
14.49%
3Y*
19.68%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBK vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBK
FBK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBK Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBK Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPGX
FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBK vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FB Financial Corporation (FBK) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBKFSPGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.44

0.66

-0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.79

1.10

-0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.15

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

0.72

-0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.68

2.51

-0.83

FBK vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBK Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBK and FSPGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBKFSPGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

0.66

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.56

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.78

-0.47

Correlation

The correlation between FBK and FSPGX is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FBK vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

FBK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than FSPGX's 0.40% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBK
FB Financial Corporation
1.50%1.36%1.32%1.51%1.44%1.00%1.04%0.81%0.57%0.00%
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.40%0.34%0.37%0.73%0.86%2.22%1.76%1.04%1.32%0.22%

Drawdowns

FBK vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBK drawdown since its inception was -65.24%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBK and FSPGX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FBKFSPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.24%

-32.66%

-32.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.08%

-16.17%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.71%

-32.66%

-14.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.42%

-16.17%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.41%

-6.43%

-9.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.18%

4.63%

+2.55%

Volatility

FBK vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FB Financial Corporation (FBK) is 5.01%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 5.33%. This indicates that FBK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FBKFSPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

5.33%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.46%

11.79%

+9.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.31%

22.32%

+8.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.37%

21.46%

+11.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.30%

21.63%

+14.67%