PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBIN vs. UBER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FBIN vs. UBER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. (FBIN) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBIN achieves a -20.66% return, which is significantly lower than UBER's -12.35% return.


FBIN

1D
0.33%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
-20.66%
6M
-22.75%
1Y
-18.15%
3Y*
-13.77%
5Y*
-13.39%
10Y*
-0.94%

UBER

1D
-2.91%
1M
-4.66%
YTD
-12.35%
6M
-18.21%
1Y
-14.37%
3Y*
21.70%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBIN vs. UBER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations Inc.
-20.66%-25.41%-9.12%35.25%-36.48%26.02%32.92%22.15%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
-12.35%35.46%-2.03%148.97%-41.02%-17.78%71.49%-28.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FBIN and UBER is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2019

0.34

The correlation between FBIN and UBER shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

FBIN:

$2.15

UBER:

$4.05

PE Ratio

FBIN:

18.24

UBER:

17.67

PS Ratio

FBIN:

1.06

UBER:

2.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

FBIN:

$3.36B

UBER:

$53.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FBIN:

$1.53B

UBER:

$22.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

FBIN:

$484.60M

UBER:

$5.85B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBIN vs. UBER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBIN
FBIN Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FBIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBIN Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FBIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBIN Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

UBER
UBER Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
UBER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBER Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBER Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
UBER Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBER Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBIN vs. UBER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. (FBIN) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBINUBERDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.43

-0.44

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.36

-0.45

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.95

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

-0.48

+0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.94

-0.87

-0.07

FBIN vs. UBER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBIN Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is comparable to the UBER Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBIN and UBER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBINUBERDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.43

-0.44

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.37

0.18

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.16

+0.15

Drawdowns

FBIN vs. UBER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBIN drawdown since its inception was -62.42%, smaller than the maximum UBER drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBIN and UBER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBINUBERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.42%

-68.05%

+5.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.93%

-30.89%

-17.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.90%

-30.89%

-31.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.90%

-60.45%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.56%

-28.45%

-27.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.65%

-25.66%

+9.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.87%

17.13%

+4.74%

Volatility

FBIN vs. UBER - Volatility Comparison

Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. (FBIN) has a higher volatility of 13.31% compared to Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) at 11.98%. This indicates that FBIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBINUBERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.31%

11.98%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.63%

24.24%

+11.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.82%

32.60%

+10.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.50%

44.88%

-8.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.05%

50.72%

-15.67%

Dividends

FBIN vs. UBER - Dividend Comparison

FBIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, while UBER has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations Inc.
2.60%2.00%1.40%1.21%1.68%0.97%1.12%1.35%2.11%1.05%1.20%1.01%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FBIN vs. UBER - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
-66.20M
13.20B
(FBIN) Total Revenue
(UBER) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FBIN vs. UBER - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%202220232024202520260
45.0%
Portfolio components
FBIN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of -66.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

UBER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.95B and revenue of 13.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.0%.

FBIN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. reported an operating income of -61.40M and revenue of -66.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 92.8%.

UBER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.92B and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.6%.

FBIN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. reported a net income of -52.20M and revenue of -66.20M, resulting in a net margin of 78.9%.

UBER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 263.00M and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FBIN and UBER have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBIN has higher volatility (13.31%) compared to UBER (11.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBIN dropped -62.42% vs UBER's -68.05%.

FBIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBIN and UBER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer