PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBIIX vs. FPADX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBIIX vs. FPADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Bond Index Fund (FBIIX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBIIX achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than FPADX's 30.04% return.


FBIIX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.99%
YTD
0.83%
6M
0.60%
1Y
2.22%
3Y*
4.12%
5Y*
0.80%
10Y*

FPADX

1D
1.25%
1M
10.70%
YTD
30.04%
6M
32.95%
1Y
58.94%
3Y*
24.97%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
10.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBIIX vs. FPADX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FBIIX
Fidelity International Bond Index Fund
0.83%2.66%4.64%7.48%-10.84%-1.84%4.43%-1.13%
FPADX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund
30.04%33.90%6.80%9.51%-20.06%-3.07%17.84%11.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FBIIX and FPADX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019

0.04

Over the past year, FBIIX and FPADX have become more correlated (0.30) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBIIX vs. FPADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBIIX
FBIIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FBIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FBIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

FPADX
FPADX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FPADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPADX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FPADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPADX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBIIX vs. FPADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Bond Index Fund (FBIIX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBIIXFPADXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.62

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

4.48

-3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.24

17.77

-15.53

FBIIX vs. FPADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBIIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the FPADX Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBIIX and FPADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBIIXFPADXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

3.34

-2.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.47

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.37

-0.15

Drawdowns

FBIIX vs. FPADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBIIX drawdown since its inception was -13.79%, smaller than the maximum FPADX drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBIIX and FPADX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBIIXFPADXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.79%

-39.16%

+25.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.78%

-13.28%

+10.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.78%

-16.09%

+13.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.74%

-37.00%

+23.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

0.00%

-1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-13.26%

+9.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

3.34%

-2.35%

Volatility

FBIIX vs. FPADX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity International Bond Index Fund (FBIIX) is 1.33%, while Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) has a volatility of 7.57%. This indicates that FBIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBIIXFPADXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

7.57%

-6.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.65%

15.40%

-12.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99%

17.80%

-14.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.59%

17.11%

-13.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.42%

17.82%

-14.40%

FBIIX vs. FPADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBIIX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FPADX's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FBIIX vs. FPADX - Dividend Comparison

FBIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than FPADX's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBIIX
Fidelity International Bond Index Fund
4.18%4.09%3.44%2.85%1.02%0.62%0.74%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FPADX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund
1.81%2.35%2.70%2.68%2.47%2.14%1.50%2.59%2.20%0.12%1.69%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBIIX and FPADX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPADX has higher volatility (7.57%) compared to FBIIX (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBIIX dropped -13.79% vs FPADX's -39.16%.

FPADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBIIX and FPADX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer