PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBGRX vs. VIMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBGRX vs. VIMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares (VIMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBGRX achieves a 13.86% return, which is significantly higher than VIMAX's 9.37% return. Over the past 10 years, FBGRX has outperformed VIMAX with an annualized return of 21.66%, while VIMAX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.61% annualized return.


FBGRX

1D
2.59%
1M
0.29%
YTD
13.86%
6M
15.39%
1Y
36.93%
3Y*
30.04%
5Y*
15.33%
10Y*
21.66%

VIMAX

1D
1.86%
1M
2.60%
YTD
9.37%
6M
8.26%
1Y
17.03%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
7.56%
10Y*
11.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBGRX vs. VIMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
13.86%19.91%39.77%55.61%-38.45%22.64%62.20%33.43%1.02%36.01%
VIMAX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares
9.37%11.67%14.66%16.53%-18.70%24.51%18.18%31.03%-9.24%19.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FBGRX and VIMAX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2001

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between FBGRX and VIMAX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBGRX vs. VIMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBGRX
FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

VIMAX
VIMAX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
VIMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
VIMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBGRX vs. VIMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares (VIMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBGRXVIMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.24

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

2.15

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.23

8.08

+4.15

FBGRX vs. VIMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the VIMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBGRX and VIMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBGRX vs. VIMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBGRX drawdown since its inception was -58.64%, roughly equal to the maximum VIMAX drawdown of -58.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBGRX and VIMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBGRXVIMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.64%

-58.88%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.65%

-8.13%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.07%

-18.93%

-8.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.08%

-27.55%

-15.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.08%

-39.30%

-3.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.97%

-1.40%

-2.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.52%

-8.11%

-4.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.16%

+0.89%

Volatility

FBGRX vs. VIMAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares (VIMAX) at 4.27%. This indicates that FBGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBGRXVIMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

4.27%

+2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.15%

9.81%

+4.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.25%

12.70%

+5.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.99%

17.69%

+7.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.74%

18.94%

+4.80%

FBGRX vs. VIMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGRX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VIMAX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBGRX vs. VIMAX - Dividend Comparison

FBGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than VIMAX's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
1.67%1.90%5.95%0.93%0.57%8.73%6.40%3.70%6.32%4.23%4.05%5.30%
VIMAX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.36%1.51%1.48%1.50%1.59%1.11%1.44%1.47%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBGRX and VIMAX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBGRX has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to VIMAX (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBGRX dropped -58.64% vs VIMAX's -58.88%.

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBGRX and VIMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer