FBGRX vs. FZAPX
FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) and FZAPX (Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FBGRX returned 20.85%/yr vs 15.10%/yr for FZAPX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FBGRX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FZAPX.
Performance
FBGRX vs. FZAPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBGRX achieves a 13.81% return, which is significantly lower than FZAPX's 17.21% return. Over the past 10 years, FBGRX has outperformed FZAPX with an annualized return of 20.85%, while FZAPX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.10% annualized return.
FBGRX
- 1D
- 2.30%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- 6M
- 14.31%
- YTD
- 13.81%
- 1Y
- 25.66%
- 3Y*
- 27.91%
- 5Y*
- 14.06%
- 10Y*
- 20.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.56%
FZAPX
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 14.30%
- YTD
- 17.21%
- 1Y
- 29.33%
- 3Y*
- 21.64%
- 5Y*
- 12.60%
- 10Y*
- 15.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FBGRX vs. FZAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 13.81% | 19.91% | 39.77% | 55.61% | -38.45% | 22.64% | 62.20% | 33.43% | 1.02% | 36.01% |
FZAPX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z | 17.21% | 18.98% | 19.88% | 27.05% | -19.49% | 23.25% | 25.03% | 32.34% | -8.52% | 24.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBGRX and FZAPX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2013 | 0.92 |
The correlation between FBGRX and FZAPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBGRX vs. FZAPX — Risk / Return Rank
FBGRX
FZAPX
FBGRX vs. FZAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z (FZAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBGRX | FZAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.39 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 3.43 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.95 | 15.55 | -7.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBGRX vs. FZAPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBGRX drawdown since its inception was -58.64%, which is greater than FZAPX's maximum drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBGRX and FZAPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBGRX | FZAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.64% | -34.37% | -24.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.65% | -9.20% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.07% | -20.84% | -6.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.08% | -25.20% | -17.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.08% | -34.37% | -8.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.72% | -0.02% | -4.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.49% | -4.52% | -7.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 2.03% | +1.54% |
Volatility
FBGRX vs. FZAPX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z (FZAPX) at 4.10%. This indicates that FBGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBGRX | FZAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 4.10% | +2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.21% | 11.48% | +4.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.07% | 14.25% | +5.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.27% | 17.93% | +7.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.85% | 18.59% | +5.26% |
FBGRX vs. FZAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBGRX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FZAPX's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBGRX vs. FZAPX - Dividend Comparison
FBGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than FZAPX's 4.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 1.67% | 1.90% | 5.95% | 0.93% | 0.57% | 8.73% | 6.40% | 3.70% | 6.32% | 4.23% | 4.05% | 5.30% |
FZAPX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z | 4.17% | 4.88% | 4.91% | 2.12% | 0.39% | 1.47% | 5.33% | 6.18% | 4.59% | 3.07% | 1.13% | 5.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, FBGRX and FZAPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FBGRX has higher volatility (7.01%) compared to FZAPX (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBGRX dropped -58.64% vs FZAPX's -34.37%.
FZAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBGRX and FZAPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer