FBGRX vs. FSLEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) and Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund (FSLEX).
FBGRX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1987. FSLEX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 29, 1989.
Performance
FBGRX vs. FSLEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FBGRX vs. FSLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | -5.77% | 19.91% | 39.77% | 55.61% | -38.45% | 22.64% | 62.20% | 33.43% | 1.02% | 36.01% |
FSLEX Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund | 0.76% | 20.38% | 20.01% | 26.29% | -26.05% | 30.30% | 21.56% | 26.86% | -13.49% | 24.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBGRX achieves a -5.77% return, which is significantly lower than FSLEX's 0.76% return. Over the past 10 years, FBGRX has outperformed FSLEX with an annualized return of 19.25%, while FSLEX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.12% annualized return.
FBGRX
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- -2.53%
- YTD
- -5.77%
- 6M
- -3.09%
- 1Y
- 27.27%
- 3Y*
- 27.14%
- 5Y*
- 12.06%
- 10Y*
- 19.25%
FSLEX
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- 0.76%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 29.44%
- 3Y*
- 18.81%
- 5Y*
- 10.11%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FBGRX vs. FSLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FBGRX and FSLEX have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Return for Risk
FBGRX vs. FSLEX — Risk / Return Rank
FBGRX
FSLEX
FBGRX vs. FSLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) and Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund (FSLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBGRX | FSLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 1.40 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.75 | 2.06 | -0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.29 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 2.38 | -0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.46 | 9.95 | -1.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBGRX | FSLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.40 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.49 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 0.61 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.33 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between FBGRX and FSLEX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FBGRX vs. FSLEX - Dividend Comparison
FBGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than FSLEX's 0.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 2.02% | 1.90% | 5.95% | 0.93% | 0.57% | 8.73% | 6.40% | 3.70% | 6.32% | 4.23% | 4.05% | 5.30% |
FSLEX Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.39% | 0.69% | 7.74% | 6.41% | 2.17% | 6.39% | 6.19% | 1.29% | 3.01% |
Drawdowns
FBGRX vs. FSLEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBGRX drawdown since its inception was -58.64%, which is greater than FSLEX's maximum drawdown of -50.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBGRX and FSLEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBGRX | FSLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.64% | -50.21% | -8.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.65% | -11.41% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.08% | -32.67% | -10.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.08% | -39.77% | -3.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.36% | -7.23% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.58% | -13.98% | +1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 3.29% | +0.25% |
Volatility
FBGRX vs. FSLEX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a higher volatility of 7.94% compared to Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund (FSLEX) at 7.28%. This indicates that FBGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FBGRX | FSLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.94% | 7.28% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.15% | 12.76% | +1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.02% | 22.40% | +2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.93% | 20.63% | +4.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.63% | 21.42% | +2.21% |