PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBGRX vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBGRX vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBGRX achieves a 13.86% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 22.73% return.


FBGRX

1D
2.59%
1M
0.29%
YTD
13.86%
6M
15.39%
1Y
36.93%
3Y*
30.04%
5Y*
15.33%
10Y*
21.66%

AVUV

1D
0.96%
1M
5.96%
YTD
22.73%
6M
19.51%
1Y
40.08%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBGRX vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
13.86%19.91%39.77%55.61%-38.45%22.64%62.20%11.93%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
22.73%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%6.43%8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FBGRX and AVUV is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.58

The correlation between FBGRX and AVUV shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBGRX vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBGRX
FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBGRX vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBGRXAVUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

5.06

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.23

15.09

-2.86

FBGRX vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBGRX and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBGRX vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBGRX drawdown since its inception was -58.64%, which is greater than AVUV's maximum drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBGRX and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBGRXAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.64%

-49.42%

-9.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.65%

-7.95%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.07%

-28.79%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.08%

-28.79%

-14.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.97%

0.00%

-3.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.52%

-7.91%

-4.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.67%

+0.38%

Volatility

FBGRX vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.53%. This indicates that FBGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBGRXAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

4.53%

+2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.15%

11.34%

+2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.25%

17.63%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.99%

22.75%

+2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.74%

28.26%

-4.52%

FBGRX vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGRX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBGRX vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

FBGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than AVUV's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.61%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
1.67%1.90%5.95%0.93%0.57%8.73%6.40%3.70%6.32%4.23%4.05%5.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBGRX and AVUV have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBGRX has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to AVUV (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBGRX dropped -58.64% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBGRX and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer