FBGLX vs. FIRVX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FBGLX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class Z6) and FIRVX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FBGLX returned 10.25%/yr vs 597.67%/yr for FIRVX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FBGLX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for FIRVX.

Performance

FBGLX vs. FIRVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class Z6 (FBGLX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund (FIRVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBGLX achieves a 13.37% return, which is significantly lower than FIRVX's 1,440,933.92% return.

FBGLX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 2.97%
• YTD: 13.37%
• 6M: 12.91%
• 1Y: 28.39%
• 3Y*: 20.30%
• 5Y*: 10.25%
• 10Y*: —

FIRVX

• 1D: 1,371,718.18%
• 1M: 1,382,668.54%
• YTD: 1,440,933.92%
• 6M: 1,439,520.33%
• 1Y: 1,540,007.78%
• 3Y*: 2,512.79%
• 5Y*: 597.67%
• 10Y*: 176.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBGLX vs. FIRVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FBGLX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class Z6	13.37%	23.38%	13.98%	19.58%	-17.92%	16.31%	17.89%	26.90%	-7.99%	9.41%
FIRVX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund	1,440,933.92%	12.25%	5.86%	10.72%	-14.63%	6.77%	12.06%	16.19%	-4.45%	5.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FBGLX and FIRVX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017	0.92

The correlation between FBGLX and FIRVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FBGLX vs. FIRVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBGLX

FBGLX Risk / Return Rank: 65
FBGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FBGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FBGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FBGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FBGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

FIRVX

FIRVX Risk / Return Rank: 84
FIRVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FIRVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
FIRVX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
FIRVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
FIRVX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBGLX vs. FIRVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class Z6 (FBGLX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund (FIRVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBGLX	FIRVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	1.17	+0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	351,355.56	-351,352.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	49,085.82	-49,084.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.99	356,370.91	-356,367.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.90	1,512,145.77	-1,512,132.87

FBGLX vs. FIRVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBGLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the FIRVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBGLX and FIRVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBGLX vs. FIRVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBGLX drawdown since its inception was -31.28%, smaller than the maximum FIRVX drawdown of -40.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBGLX and FIRVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBGLX	FIRVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.28%	-40.59%	+9.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.88%	-4.51%	-5.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.04%	-6.52%	-8.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.11%	-20.10%	-7.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	0.00%	-0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.43%	-4.97%	-0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.28%	1.06%	+1.22%

Volatility

FBGLX vs. FIRVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class Z6 (FBGLX) is 5.68%, while Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund (FIRVX) has a volatility of 952.63%. This indicates that FBGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIRVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBGLX	FIRVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.68%	952.63%	-946.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.75%	952.62%	-940.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.76%	1,374,447.92%	-1,374,434.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.15%	614,671.81%	-614,656.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.09%	434,465.54%	-434,449.45%

FBGLX vs. FIRVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGLX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FIRVX's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBGLX vs. FIRVX - Dividend Comparison

FBGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.36%, less than FIRVX's 102.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGLX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class Z6	6.36%	5.51%	1.77%	1.99%	11.09%	9.48%	5.16%	6.86%	10.56%	2.74%	0.00%	0.00%
FIRVX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund	102.87%	2.83%	2.74%	2.57%	3.52%	4.61%	3.74%	3.18%	6.90%	25.16%	2.28%	4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBGLX and FIRVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FBGLX and FIRVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FBGLX or FIRVX?

FIRVX has higher volatility (952.63%) compared to FBGLX (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBGLX dropped -31.28% vs FIRVX's -40.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBGLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.