PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBGLX vs. FFLDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBGLX vs. FFLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class Z6 (FBGLX) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund (FFLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FBGLX having a 12.71% return and FFLDX slightly lower at 12.62%.


FBGLX

1D
0.53%
1M
4.78%
YTD
12.71%
6M
14.42%
1Y
28.79%
3Y*
20.22%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*

FFLDX

1D
0.42%
1M
5.61%
YTD
12.62%
6M
13.52%
1Y
28.72%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
12.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBGLX vs. FFLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class Z6
12.71%23.38%13.98%19.58%-17.92%16.31%17.89%26.90%-7.99%9.41%
FFLDX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund
12.62%21.48%14.18%19.93%-17.32%15.93%16.52%26.02%-7.16%10.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FBGLX and FFLDX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.99

The correlation between FBGLX and FFLDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBGLX vs. FFLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBGLX
FBGLX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FBGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FBGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FFLDX
FFLDX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FFLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FFLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBGLX vs. FFLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class Z6 (FBGLX) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund (FFLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBGLXFFLDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.29

2.49

-0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.17

3.44

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.46

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

3.21

-0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.03

14.26

-1.23

FBGLX vs. FFLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBGLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the FFLDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBGLX and FFLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBGLXFFLDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

2.49

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.72

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.73

+0.01

Drawdowns

FBGLX vs. FFLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBGLX drawdown since its inception was -31.28%, roughly equal to the maximum FFLDX drawdown of -30.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBGLX and FFLDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBGLXFFLDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.28%

-30.72%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.88%

-9.06%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.04%

-14.74%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.11%

-26.18%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-4.57%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

2.04%

+0.20%

Volatility

FBGLX vs. FFLDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class Z6 (FBGLX) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund (FFLDX) at 3.56%. This indicates that FBGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBGLXFFLDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

3.56%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.58%

9.46%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.77%

11.69%

+1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.98%

14.43%

+0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.04%

15.17%

+0.87%

FBGLX vs. FFLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGLX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FFLDX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBGLX vs. FFLDX - Dividend Comparison

FBGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, more than FFLDX's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class Z6
6.39%5.51%1.77%1.99%11.09%9.48%5.16%6.86%10.56%2.74%0.00%0.00%
FFLDX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund
1.71%2.00%2.02%1.96%3.04%1.99%1.91%10.83%2.39%1.97%2.42%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FBGLX and FFLDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FBGLX has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to FFLDX (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBGLX dropped -31.28% vs FFLDX's -30.72%.

FFLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBGLX and FFLDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer