FBGKX vs. FUAMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FBGKX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K) and FUAMX (Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FBGKX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FUAMX is a Government Bonds fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FBGKX returned 17.17%/yr vs -0.36%/yr for FUAMX. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. FBGKX charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FUAMX.

Performance

FBGKX vs. FUAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K (FBGKX) and Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBGKX achieves a 18.59% return, which is significantly higher than FUAMX's -0.27% return.

FBGKX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 9.11%
• YTD: 18.59%
• 6M: 19.80%
• 1Y: 45.08%
• 3Y*: 32.64%
• 5Y*: 17.17%
• 10Y*: 21.98%

FUAMX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: -0.27%
• 6M: -0.64%
• 1Y: 4.20%
• 3Y*: 3.20%
• 5Y*: -0.36%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBGKX vs. FUAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FBGKX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K	18.59%	19.99%	39.87%	55.76%	-38.40%	22.74%	62.35%	33.56%	1.11%	5.04%
FUAMX Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund	-0.27%	8.00%	0.40%	4.08%	-13.06%	-3.19%	8.86%	7.25%	1.25%	-0.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FBGKX and FUAMX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017	-0.05

The correlation between FBGKX and FUAMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FBGKX vs. FUAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBGKX

FBGKX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FBGKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FBGKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FBGKX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FBGKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FBGKX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

FUAMX

FUAMX Risk / Return Rank: 12
FUAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
FUAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
FUAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
FUAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
FUAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBGKX vs. FUAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K (FBGKX) and Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBGKX	FUAMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	0.95	+1.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.43	1.44	+1.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.17	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.70	1.11	+2.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.65	3.27	+12.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FBGKX vs. FUAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBGKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the FUAMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBGKX and FUAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBGKX	FUAMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.68	0.95	+1.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	-0.05	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.22	+0.48

Drawdowns

FBGKX vs. FUAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBGKX drawdown since its inception was -48.90%, which is greater than FUAMX's maximum drawdown of -20.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBGKX and FUAMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBGKX	FUAMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.90%	-20.25%	-28.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.63%	-3.72%	-8.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.06%	-6.07%	-20.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.03%	-18.27%	-24.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.69%	+6.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.36%	-7.32%	-1.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	1.26%	+1.72%

Volatility

FBGKX vs. FUAMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K (FBGKX) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX) at 1.44%. This indicates that FBGKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBGKX	FUAMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.15%	1.44%	+2.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.01%	3.09%	+9.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.47%	4.34%	+13.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.87%	6.63%	+18.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.68%	5.85%	+17.83%

FBGKX vs. FUAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGKX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FUAMX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBGKX vs. FUAMX - Dividend Comparison

FBGKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than FUAMX's 3.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGKX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K	1.59%	1.89%	6.00%	0.93%	0.56%	8.77%	6.41%	3.70%	6.41%	4.26%	4.22%	5.36%
FUAMX Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund	3.75%	3.52%	3.58%	2.20%	1.24%	1.76%	2.90%	2.16%	2.23%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBGKX and FUAMX in my portfolio?

FBGKX and FUAMX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBGKX or FUAMX?

FBGKX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to FUAMX (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBGKX dropped -48.90% vs FUAMX's -20.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBGKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.